Massive changes to California voting spark fears of Iowa-style primary
chaos
Send a link to a friend
[February 25, 2020]
By Tim Reid
LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - As he looks ahead
to California's March 3 Democratic primary, Neal Kelley is having
sleepless nights.
Kelley is the elections chief for Orange County, part of a wave of
California counties rolling out sweeping new balloting procedures
affecting millions of voters in the nation's most populous state.
He has good reason to be worried.
Memories of the chaos that plagued Iowa's first-in-the-nation caucuses
on Feb. 3 have election officials nationwide looking to avoid similar
embarrassment. Iowa's results were delayed for days, in part because of
the failure of an unproven vote-counting app.
Some mammoth California counties are unveiling their own new voting
technology. They're also eliminating thousands of polling places in the
hopes that voters will make use of expanded mail-in balloting or take
advantage of extended early in-person voting.
The stakes are high. With 415 delegates up for grabs – the largest haul
in the country, accounting for more than 20% of the 1,991 delegates a
candidate must win to secure the Democratic nomination on the first
ballot – California will have considerable influence in choosing the
eventual nominee. Its early primary this year will give the Golden State
even more sway. Four years ago, its primary was held in June.
That also means a California-sized screw-up would dwarf the dysfunction
in Iowa.
“I’m not going to sit here and say nothing can go wrong,” Kelley said.
“It’s a transition to a whole new system of voting. I am getting very
little sleep.”
NEW MACHINES, NEW ISSUES
California’s shift stems in part from a 2016 state law known as the
Voter’s Choice Act aimed at making voting easier and more flexible for
the state’s 20.5 million registered voters. California’s 58 counties can
choose whether to participate. Five did so in the 2018 election cycle.
Another 10 are making the leap this year. Combined, they account for
half of California's electorate.
Los Angeles County - the state's largest county with 5.4 million
registered voters - has embarked on a parallel modernization program of
its own. Part of its effort includes new voting machines, which are
already drawing scrutiny.
The city of Beverly Hills in January filed a lawsuit demanding changes
to the new touch-screen system, which displays just four candidates at a
time. To see additional candidates voters must navigate a “confusing
series of steps” that raises the risk they won’t see all the available
choices, the lawsuit alleges. For example, California's Democratic
primary ballot lists 20 presidential candidates, only eight of whom are
still in the race.
A ruling is not expected before the March 3 primary, according to
Beverly Hills City Attorney Laurence Wiener.
Mike Sanchez, a spokesman for the Los Angeles County
Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk, the office in charge of elections,
declined to discuss the lawsuit. He said the agency held a mock election
in September to test the new equipment and made improvements based on
user feedback, including upgrades to the buttons that help voters
navigate the candidate lists.
Orange County, too, is introducing new digital voting machines, albeit
by a different manufacturer. Kelley, the county’s registrar of voters,
said there are large prompts at the bottom of each screen as well as
“ultra-clear” orange scroll buttons to ensure voters can see all the
candidates.
The new electronic voting machines in Los Angeles and Orange counties do
not themselves count ballots. After voters key in their choices, the
machines print out paper ballots showing their selections. Once
satisfied, voters place their completed ballots into drop boxes in the
machines. The ballots are later collected by election workers and taken
to a secure location where they are counted via a central tally system.
Voters are not required to use the machines; they can fill out paper
ballots by hand if they prefer.
New technology is just the beginning. Traditional polling places have
been replaced by so-called Voting Centers that election officials say
will be larger and better-staffed. Early in-person voting at some of
these facilities began on Feb. 22. Voting Centers will offer same-day
registration, even on election day. Voters will no longer be tied to a
single polling place near their homes, rather they can cast ballots at
any Voting Center in their county.
In addition, election officials sent ballots to all registered voters in
participating counties in the hopes of encouraging more people to vote
by mail.
[to top of second column]
|
A voters cast their ballots in the March 3 Super Tuesday primary as
new voting procedures and technology are used to make voting easier
and more secure in Santa Ana, California, U.S., February 24, 2020.
Picture taken February 24, 2020. REUTERS/Mike Blake
FEWER POLLING PLACES
The tradeoff is that there will be markedly fewer polling places. In
Los Angeles County, for example, there will be about 970 Voting
Centers open for next month’s primary, less than a quarter of the
4,500 polling places that were operating during the 2016 primary.
Election officials are betting so many people will vote by mail or
head to a Voting Center early that fewer sites will be needed on
election day.
Los Angeles County’s Sanchez said the county has made a major effort
to educate voters, including direct mailings to their homes and
informational spots across a host of media.
Still, getting the word out has been a challenge, said Marilu
Guevara, executive director of the League of Women Voters of Los
Angeles.
“My concern is we have such a large number of voters and election
day will come and they will show up at their old polling places, or
will be unaware of the new voting system,” Guevara said. “A lot of
voters have still not heard about the changes. I know that. I’m
talking to people.”
Lee Jackson is among the confused. A resident of La Habra Heights in
Los Angeles County, the 45-year-old business development consultant
said he intends to vote in the Democratic primary. But he has only
"vaguely" heard about this year's changes and isn't sure where to
find the nearest Voting Center.
In addition, Jackson said he is registered as “No Party Preference,”
a designation chosen by about one in four California voters. The
state’s Democratic Party allows unaffiliated voters to participate
in its primary, but they must specifically request a Democratic
ballot with the names of the party’s presidential candidates.
“Boy, I had no idea about that,” said Jackson, 45.
'MILITARY OPERATION'
Rick Hasen, an elections expert at the University of California
Irvine School of Law, and the author of a recent book entitled
“Election Meltdown,” said it was “unfortunate” that California is
introducing so many changes in such an important and closely watched
primary.
“There is real potential for voter confusion, with new polling
places, new timings, and new machines,” Hasen said. “Nobody wants to
be the next Iowa. Ideally you would try these changes in an election
that has a lower status."
California's delegate mother lode is crucial in this year's
presidential nominating process. After watching smaller states
winnow the candidate field in 2016, California moved its primary up
by three months to give its reliably Democratic electorate more
influence in deciding who will face Republican incumbent Donald
Trump in the November general election. California is one of 14
states that will vote on March 3, known as "Super Tuesday,” with
over one third of delegates on offer in the nominating battle.
Kelley, the Orange County registrar of voters, said his team has
been preparing for this moment for the past four years. “This is as
close to a military operation as you can get in the civilian world,”
he said.
But the sheer number of California voters affected could expose any
weaknesses in the system. California Secretary of State Alex Padilla
on Saturday predicted record voter turnout in 2020. "As a result,
Election Day wait times may be longer than normal," he said in a
statement urging Californians to vote early.
Super Tuesday will provide a real-time test as to whether the
state's voters got that message, said Justin Levitt, a political
science professor at California State University, Long Beach. He
said the sharp reduction in Los Angeles polling locations is a
particular concern given the region's congestion and limited public
transport.
“Traffic problems in L.A. are legendary,” Levitt said. “There are a
lot of people wondering how this will go.”
(Reporting by Tim Reid; Editing by Marla Dickerson)
[© 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2020 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |