The
proposal is one of six that will face a vote at the company's
annual shareholder meeting at Apple's headquarters in Cupertino,
California.
The shareholder proposal on freedom of expression focuses on
Apple's 2017 removal of virtual private network apps https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-apple-vpn/apple-says-it-is-removing-vpn-services-from-china-app-store-idUSKBN1AE0BQ
from its App Store in China. Such apps allow users to bypass
China’s so-called “Great Firewall” aimed at restricting access
to overseas sites.
Apple opposes the proposal, saying it already provides extensive
information about when it takes down apps at the request of
governments around the world and that it follows the laws in
countries where it operates.
"[W]hile we may disagree with certain decisions at times, we do
not believe it would be in the best interests of our users to
simply abandon markets, which would leave consumers with fewer
choices and fewer privacy protections," Apple said in its
opposition.
Proxy advisory firms Glass Lewis and Institutional Shareholder
Services both recommend votes in favor the measure, according to
reports from them seen by Reuters.
Apple shareholders have voted down human rights measures related
to China in the past. They defeated a 2018 proposal https://www.reuters.com/article/us-apple-shareholders/apple-ceo-downplays-special-dividend-at-shareholder-meeting-idUSKCN1FX2GA
that urged Apple to create a human rights panel to oversee
issues such as workplace conditions and censorship in China,
with 94.4 percent of shareholders voting against it.
Shareholders will also vote on a proposal to allow shareholders
to nominate more than one director to Apple's board and whether
to tie executive compensation to environmental sustainability
metrics. Apple opposes both proposals.
(Reporting by Stephen Nellis in San Francisco; Editing by Dan
Grebler)
[© 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2020 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|
|