Where U.S. presidential candidates stand on breaking up Big Tech
Send a link to a friend
[January 24, 2020]
By Elizabeth Culliford
(Reuters) - In the run-up to the U.S. 2020
presidential election, many Democratic White House contenders have
argued in favor of either breaking up or tightening regulation of
companies such as Facebook Inc <FB.O>, Alphabet Inc's Google <GOOGL.O>
and Amazon.com Inc <AMZN.O>.
Republican President Donald Trump's administration has also stepped up
its scrutiny of Big Tech, conducting a wide-ranging probe into whether
major digital tech companies engaged in anticompetitive practices.
Social media platforms are under particular scrutiny over their efforts
to curb dissemination of misinformation and false claims, years after
U.S. intelligence agencies said Russia used them to wage an influence
operation aimed at interfering with the 2016 election. Moscow has denied
the claim.
Here are the leading presidential candidates' positions on Big Tech.
PRESIDENT TRUMP
Trump, whose digital campaign helped propel him to the White House in
2016, has stopped short of calling for tech giants to be broken up, but
said "obviously there is something going on in terms of monopoly," when
asked about major tech companies in the past.
Trump's Department of Justice announced in July it was conducting an
antitrust review of "market-leading online platforms."
Big tech companies such as Facebook, Google, Apple Inc <AAPL.O> and
Amazon also face a slew of U.S. antitrust probes by the federal
government, state attorneys general and Congress.
FORMER VICE PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN
Biden slammed big tech companies in a January interview with the New
York Times, saying he had "never been a fan of Facebook" and arguing
that online platforms should not be allowed immunity for content posted
by users.
He also clashed with Facebook and Google over their political ad
policies after they refused to take down a Trump ad that the Biden team
said contained false claims about his son Hunter's dealings with
Ukraine.
Biden, who was vice president in the Silicon Valley-friendly Obama
administration, has said that splitting up companies such as Facebook
was "something we should take a really hard look at" but that it was
"premature" to make a final judgment.
U.S. SENATOR ELIZABETH WARREN
Warren is leading the charge to break up big tech companies on the
grounds they hold outsized influence and stifle competition.
She has called for legislation to restrict large tech platforms - which
she would designate as "platform utilities" -from owning and
participating in a marketplace at the same time. Under this law, Apple
would not be allowed to both run the App Store and sell its own apps on
it, for example.
The senator from Massachusetts also said she would nominate regulators
to unwind anticompetitive mergers such as Facebook's deals for WhatsApp
and Instagram, and Amazon's deal for the Whole Foods supermarket chain.
Warren has criticized Facebook's policy of exempting politicians' ads
from fact-checking, running deliberately false ads that claimed Chief
Executive Mark Zuckerberg had endorsed Trump's re-election bid.
U.S. SENATOR BERNIE SANDERS
Sanders, who frequently criticizes corporate influence, has also called
for the breakup of big tech companies such as Facebook and Amazon.
The Vermont lawmaker has also said that he will have the Federal Trade
Commission (FTC) review all mergers that have taken place during the
Trump administration. His broad plan to reshape corporate America would
also mandate all large companies be owned partly by their workers.
[to top of second column]
|
The logos of Amazon, Apple, Facebook and Google are seen in a
combination photo from Reuters files. REUTERS/File Photos/File Photo
Sanders has been particularly vocal in his attacks on Amazon over
its tax contributions and working conditions at its warehouses.
PETE BUTTIGIEG
In general, Pete Buttigieg, who became Facebook's 287th user shortly
after it was launched in 2004 at Harvard University, where he was a
student, has been more reluctant to slam the tech giants than some
other candidates.
Though he has said that the breakup of big tech companies "should be
on the table," the former South Bend, Indiana, mayor does not think
it is a politician's place to designate which companies should be
broken up.
U.S. SENATOR AMY KLOBUCHAR
Klobuchar has made oversight of big technology companies one of her
major issues in Congress and argued for data privacy laws and net
neutrality safeguards as priorities at her campaign launch in
February.
She has not endorsed Warren's plan for their breakup, saying that
she would first want investigations. Her plan for her first 100 days
in office includes an "aggressive retrospective review of mergers,"
which she said she would pay for with an extra merger fee on
"megamergers."
MICHAEL BLOOMBERG
Former New York City Mayor Bloomberg told the Bay Area News Group in
January that breaking up big tech companies "just to be nasty is not
an answer" and that he does not think Senators Warren and Sanders
"know what they're talking about" on the issue. He said he was open
to more limited antitrust enforcement.
The billionaire media mogul, who has launched a television and
digital ad blitz, says online platforms should be legally treated
the same as news publications. As the founder of Bloomberg News, he
made his fortune selling financial information to Wall Street firms.
ANDREW YANG
Although Yang has said "we would be well served" if big tech
companies were to break themselves up, he has argued that
competition is not the answer to key problems with big tech.
Yang, the former chief executive of a start-up, has focused on the
negative effects of tech on mental health and said he would create a
Department of Attention Economy to look at how to responsibly design
and use apps and devices.
Yang, who has benefited from a surge of grassroots social media
supporters, told the New York Times in January that he did not "have
confidence that any of my opponents get the internet."
TOM STEYER
California billionaire Steyer says that monopolies either have to be
dismantled or regulated, but that to win against Trump, Democrats
will have to "show the American people that we don't just know how
to tax and have programs to break up companies."
Steyer's campaign has been noted for its massive ad spending, which
helped push him to the debate stage, including more than $17 million
in Facebook ads, according to Democratic digital firm Bully Pulpit
Interactive.
(Reporting by Elizabeth Culliford; editing by Soyoung Kim and
Jonathan Oatis)
[© 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2020 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |