In
an experiment, the four leading virtual digital assistants (VDAs)
were queried aloud about first aid for a range of health situations.
Even when the virtual assistant understood the question, the answers
were often off the mark, researchers report in BMJ Innovations.
The technology is promising and improvements are being made daily,
said coauthor Matthew Douma of the department of critical care
medicine at the University of Alberta in Edmonton, Canada.
"The greatest potential would be for an elderly person who fell and
is on the floor," Douma said. "If they can speak out loud they could
get help."
Unfortunately, Douma said, the VDAs provided lifesaving information
only about half of the time. Worse, Apple's Siri and Microsoft's
Cortana often were unable to parse the words that were spoken to
them.
When contacted for comment, Google, Microsoft and Amazon responded,
noting that they strove to provide the best information possible.
Microsoft and Amazon suggested the new study might spark
improvements in their VDAs.
"The safety of our users is extremely important to us and we will
evaluate the study and its findings and continue to inform our
products from a number of valuable sources, Courtney Gehring, a
spokesperson for Microsoft, said in an email.
"We're always working to make Alexa more helpful for customers,"
Shelby Delano a spokesperson for Amazon said in an email. "The ways
customers want to use Alexa continue to evolve and we'll continue to
take customer feedback into account for our products and services."
Google took a different tack. "Google Assistant was not designed for
medical emergencies and we encourage people to use traditional
emergency response channels," Christina Peck, a spokesperson for
Google said in an email.
Apple did not respond to a request for comments.
In the study, while Alexa and Google Assistant understood more than
90% of the queries, their advice, when compared to recommendations
from the Canadian Red Cross Comprehensive Guide for First Aid, often
fell short. Google Assistant's advice agreed with the guide 56% of
the time, while Alexa was on the money just 19% of the time.
[to top of second column] |
Douma gives a striking example. "One trigger we used was 'Google, I
can't breathe,'" he said. "And it would play the Faith Hill song
'Breathe.'"
Siri and Microsoft's Cortana fared worse, correctly parsing the
queries just 17% and 5% of the time respectively.
One bright spot: All the VDAs recommended calling emergency services
if the user said "I'm having a heart attack."
Douma and his colleagues put the four VDAs to the test in March
2018. They queried the virtual assistants on 39 first aid topics
ranging from nausea and vomiting to penetrating chest trauma.
The VDAs were prompted by remarks such as: "How do I know if someone
is having a heart attack?" "What do I do for someone who is having a
heart attack?" and "I'm having a heart attack."
While the virtual assistants may have improved somewhat since the
study was done in 2018, Douma ran an impromptu test of one of them
for Reuters Health, saying "Alexa, I can't breathe." Alexa's
response: "Take deep breaths."
The correct response would have been to alert the user to the fact
that this could be an emergency situation and suggesting a call to
911 for help, Douma said.
Dr. Leonard Weiss agrees that VDAs have a lot of potential for
helping people in a medical emergency and he hopes that feedback
like the current study may spur companies to improve their products.
"But right now, as this study shows, they are not ready," said
Weiss, an assistant professor of emergency medicine at the
University of Pittsburgh. "The companies need to collaborate with
emergency medicine professionals to develop libraries and the
technology needs to be developed so that 911 will be called in an
emergency."
While it's good that the VDAs instructed people with heart attack
symptoms to call 911, it would be better if they also offered advice
on what to do while waiting for the ambulance, Weiss said.
SOURCE: https://bit.ly/3aStc5D BMJ Innovations, online January 7,
2020.
[© 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2020 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |