| 
					
 
 Illinois voters will have a rare opportunity to directly decide 
on taxes at the ballot box Nov. 3. That’s because in 2019, Illinois lawmakers 
approved a defining feature of Gov. J.B. Pritzker’s policy agenda by agreeing to 
ask voters to amend the Illinois Constitution and remove its flat tax 
protection. 
 
Pritzker has made the adoption of a progressive income tax, which he calls the 
“fair tax,” a centerpiece of his policy agenda. The introductory rates attached 
to his plan would hike taxes on residents and businesses with incomes of 
$250,000 or more. Meanwhile, low-income residents would see a tax reduction of 
$6, while still paying the highest tax burden in the Midwest. 
 
In his first budget address, the governor claimed “a fair tax is what 
three-quarters of states with income taxes have.” 
  
But is that true? 
 
The answer depends on how you define a “fair tax.” Pritzker has consistently 
sought to paint his plan as one that raises taxes only on “the rich,” while 
claiming everyone else would pay the same or less. 
 
“It is not fair that I pay the same tax rate as a teacher, a child care worker, 
a police officer or a nurse,” Pritzker said. 
 
However, in more than half of the states Pritzker claims have a “fair tax,” he 
would indeed pay the same tax rate as many middle-class taxpayers. That’s 
because in 18 of the 32 states that allow politicians to tax people differently 
based on income, the maximum tax rate hits at or near Illinois’ median family 
income of $79,168. 
Pritzker is lumping together states such as California – which 
has 10 tax rates ranging from 1% to 13.3% on income over $1 million – with 
states such as Alabama that work much more like Illinois’ flat tax. Alabama has 
just 3 separate tax brackets and rates, with the maximum 5% rate affecting all 
income above just $3,000 for single filers or $6,000 for joint filers. 
 
[ to 
top of second column] | 
            
			 
  
			In fact, a political group funded by Pritzker 
			received a “Mostly False” rating from PolitiFact for making claims 
			similar to Pritzker’s. 
			 
			The bottom line is in most states with a progressive income tax, the 
			middle class is among the hardest hit. These facts undermine 
			Pritzker’s claim that most states have a plan similar to his “fair 
			tax” proposal and help demonstrate that removing the flat tax 
			protection from Illinois’ constitution is almost certain to result 
			in higher taxes on middle-class residents. 
			 
			Simply put, the middle class is where the money is. More than 60% of 
			taxable income belongs to Illinoisans making less than $100,000 a 
			year. 
			 
			If lawmakers sought to make up revenue losses from the COVID-19 
			economic fallout through the progressive income tax by raising taxes 
			at the same proportions as the initial tax rates, the typical 
			Illinois family would have to pay between $286 and $1,056 in 
			additional taxes. If Pritzker were to try to fulfill his campaign 
			promises for billions of dollars in additional spending, the typical 
			family could pay up to $3,500 more. 
			 
			Illinois residents deserve accurate information when they head to 
			the polls to decide whether to grant lawmakers the broad new taxing 
			powers Pritzker has requested. The governor should stop making 
			misleading claims to sell his plan. 
			
			
            
			Click here to respond to the editor about this article 
			
			
			  
			
			  
			 |