U.S. officials say the United States acquired intelligence
suggesting that Russia may have paid bounties to
Taliban-affiliated militants to kill U.S.-led coalition forces
in Afghanistan, but stress that intelligence was not conclusive.
The Pentagon has said it had "no corroborating evidence" to
validate the allegations, which Moscow denies.
Marine General Frank McKenzie, the head of U.S. Central Command,
underscored the U.S. military's caution in the most extensive
remarks to date about the issue from a defense official.
"I'm very familiar with this material and I'm a theater
commander and I've had an opportunity to look at it. I found it
very worrisome. I just didn't find that there was a causative
link there," McKenzie told reporters, according to a transcript
released by Central Command.
Pressed on whether he believed Russian payments led to U.S.
deaths, McKenzie said: "No, I'm not convinced of that. I'm just
not."
He added that battlefield intelligence was often inconclusive.
"But in this case, there just wasn't enough there," McKenzie
said.
"I sent the intelligence guys back to continue to dig on it. And
I believe they're continuing to dig right now."
The Washington Post had reported that the bounties were believed
to have led to the deaths of several service members in
Afghanistan and the New York Times said investigators were
focused on two attacks, including an April 2019 bombing outside
an air base that killed three Marines.
President Donald Trump, a Republican who has worked to cultivate
warmer relations with Moscow, has downplayed the significance of
the intelligence and denied being briefed on the matter before
it was reported by news outlets last month.
The U.S. military previously accused Russia of possibly
providing support, including weapons, to elements of the
Taliban. McKenzie noted that the Russians were "not our friends
in Afghanistan and they do not wish us well."
But he also noted that whether the Russians were paying them or
not, "the Taliban have done their level best to carry out
operations against us."
"So nothing has practically changed on the ground in terms of
force protection, because we have a very high force protection
standard now," he said.
(Reporting by Phil Stewart; Editing by Peter Cooney)
[© 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2020 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|
|