Britain set to ban Huawei from 5G, though timescale
unclear
Send a link to a friend
[July 13, 2020] By
Paul Sandle and Guy Faulconbridge
LONDON (Reuters) - Prime Minister Boris
Johnson is set to ban Huawei from Britain's 5G network in a landmark
decision that will anger Beijing but win plaudits from President Donald
Trump as the United States grapples with China's rising economic and
technological clout.
The United States has pushed Johnson to reverse his January decision to
grant Huawei a limited role in 5G, while London has been dismayed by a
crackdown in Hong Kong and by the perception that China did not tell the
whole truth over coronavirus.
Britain's National Security Council (NSC), chaired by Johnson, will meet
on Tuesday to discuss Huawei. Media Secretary Oliver Dowden will
announce a decision to the House of Commons later in the day.
The immediate excuse for the about turn in British policy is the impact
of new U.S. sanctions on chip technology, which London says affects
Huawei's ability to remain a reliable supplier in the future.
It is unclear how far Johnson will go on Tuesday. Operators already had
to cap Huawei's role in 5G at 35% by 2023. Reducing it to zero over an
additional two to fours years is now being discussed, although some
telecoms firms have warned that going too fast could delay key
technology and disrupt services.
Asked about Huawei in June, Johnson said he would protect critical
infrastructure from "hostile state vendors". Justice Secretary Robert
Buckland said on Monday the "priority" in the decision would be national
security.
The United States says Huawei, the world's biggest producer of telecoms
equipment, is an agent of the Chinese Communist State and cannot be
trusted.
Huawei denies it spies for China and has said the United States wants to
frustrate its growth because no U.S. company could offer the same range
of technology at a competitive price.
NEW COLD WAR?
In what some have compared to the Cold War antagonism with the Soviet
Union, the United States is worried that 5G dominance is a milestone
towards Chinese technological supremacy that could define the
geopolitics of the 21st century.
[to top of second column] |
The Huawei logo is seen at the high profile startups and high tech
leaders gathering, Viva Tech,in Paris, France May 16, 2019.
REUTERS/Charles Platiau/File Photo
Angering China just as Britain extracts itself from the European Union will put
London firmly back on the side of its closest ally, the United States.
It would also mark the end of what former Prime Minister David Cameron cast as a
"golden era" in ties with China.
China's ambassador to Britain said earlier this month a U-turn on Huawei would
damage Britain's image and it would have to "bear the consequences" if it
treated China as a hostile country.
HUAWEI BANNED?
In January, Johnson defied Trump by allowing so-called high-risk companies'
involvement in 5G - including Huawei - to be capped at 35%. He excluded such
companies from the sensitive 5G "core", where data is processed, as well as
critical networks and locations such as nuclear and military sites.
Britain's major telecoms networks have said they need at least five years, and
ideally seven, to remove Huawei.
BT CEO Philip Jansen urged the government on Monday not to move too fast on a
ban, cautioning there could be outages and even security issues if it did.
"If we get to a situation where things need to go very, very fast, then you are
into a situation where potentially service for 24 million BT Group mobile
customers is put into question - outages," he told BBC radio.
Huawei has said the implications of the U.S. sanctions are not yet clear, and it
has urged Britain to wait. The Telegraph newspaper said on Friday the government
was expected to set a deadline of 2025 for removing Huawei equipment.
(Reporting by Guy Faulconbridge and Paul Sandle, editing by David Milliken and
Mark Potter)
[© 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2020 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |