Exclusive: Global banks scrutinize their Hong Kong
clients for pro-democracy ties - sources
Send a link to a friend
[July 20, 2020] By
Sumeet Chatterjee, James Pomfret and Greg Torode
HONG KONG (Reuters) - Global wealth
managers are examining whether their clients in Hong Kong have ties to
the city's pro-democracy movement, in an attempt to avoid getting caught
in the crosshairs of China's new national security law, according to six
people with knowledge of the matter.
Bankers at Credit Suisse Group AG <CSGN.S>, HSBC Holdings Plc <HSBA.L>,
Julius Baer Gruppe AG <BAER.S> and UBS Group AG <UBSG.S>, among others,
are broadening scrutiny under their programs that screen clients for
political and government ties and subjecting them to additional
diligence requirements, these people said.
The designation, called politically exposed persons, can make it more
difficult or altogether prevent people from accessing banking services,
depending on what the bank finds about the person's source of wealth or
financial transactions.
The checks at some wealth managers have involved combing through
comments made by clients and their associates in public and in media,
and social media posts in the recent past, these people said. The new
law prohibits what Beijing describes broadly as secession, subversion,
terrorism and collusion with foreign forces, with up to life in prison
for offenders.
The sources, who requested anonymity because of the sensitivity of the
situation, said the broadened scrutiny of clients also applied to Hong
Kong and Chinese officials who had implemented the law in anticipation
of any U.S. sanctions against them.
One banker at a global wealth manager that holds more than $200 billion
in assets said the audit of its clients could go back as far as 2014 in
some cases to gauge a client's political stance since Hong Kong's 2014
pro-democracy "umbrella" movement. Protesters at the time used umbrellas
to shield themselves from tear gas and pepper spray deployed by police.
Reuters could not learn the identities of any people who had faced
enhanced scrutiny or whether the banks had decided to take any action
against people identified as politically exposed.
Albert Ho, a veteran Hong Kong democrat who runs a law firm and helps
organise an annual candlelight vigil to commemorate victims of the June
4, 1989 Tiananmen Square crackdown, said he feared that people like him
may face “difficulties in the times to come.”
“There’s not much you can do, actually, unless you cease all your
financial and banking activities in Hong Kong,” Ho said, adding he had
not faced additional scrutiny from his bank as of last week. He declined
to disclose the name of his bank.
HSBC declined to comment specifically on the security law or any U.S.
move to sanction local officials. In an emailed statement, it said, "We
already have a stringent set of policies and rigorous processes in place
which we apply globally.”
Credit Suisse, Julius Baer and UBS declined to comment.
When asked about the scrutiny after it announced its half-year results
on Monday, Julius Baer CEO Philipp Rickenbacher also declined to
comment, adding the bank would continue to develop its business in Hong
Kong.
In an emailed statement, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority said the
financial hub implements anti-money laundering requirements "based on
international standards including with regard to politically exposed
persons."
"The relevant international standards and our guidance to the banking
industry have not changed," the city’s de facto central bank said.
[to top of second column] |
A Star Ferry boat crosses Victoria Harbour in front of a skyline of
buildings during sunset, as a meeting on national security
legislation takes place in Hong Kong, China June 29, 2020.
REUTERS/Tyrone Siu/File Photo
China's foreign ministry, the Liaison Office in Hong Kong and the State
Council's Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office did not respond to requests for
comment.
BANKS IN FOCUS
Global banks have long examined the backgrounds of their clients, including
screening them for political ties, to satisfy regulatory requirements.
Politicians, government officials and senior executives at state-owned
enterprises, as well as their family members, are typically considered
politically exposed persons.
The rules are meant to enforce laws such as international sanctions and to
prevent people from using the banking system to launder ill-gotten wealth.
The banks' move to subject supporters of Hong Kong's democracy movement to a
similar review comes at a time when the stance of some firms on the Chinese law
has drawn scrutiny from Western lawmakers and activists.
HSBC and Standard Chartered Plc <STAN.L>, which have expressed support of the
national security law, for example, have faced criticism from UK officials that
their actions enabled Beijing to undermine the rule of law in the former British
colony.
The two London-headquartered banks have said they believed the law would restore
stability in Hong Kong.
Both Hong Kong and Chinese officials have said the law was vital to plug holes
in national security defences, rejecting criticism from governments, including
the United States and the United Kingdom, that China was violating its promise
to safeguard Hong Kong's freedom for 50 years after the 1997 handover.
REGULATORY RISKS
Some wealth managers in Hong Kong say they are worried about the regulatory and
reputation risks to their banks if charges under the sweeping security law are
brought against some of their politically linked clients, three of the sources
said.
A top executive at a regional wealth manager said that his firm's risk and
compliance team prepared a list of top 10 Hong Kong individuals identified in
local media as pro-democracy sympathisers within a couple of days of the
enactment of the law on July 1, the anniversary of the handover.
The executive said their firm checked its internal database to see if they had
existing relationship with any of them and were "quite relieved" to see that
they didn't.
Several elements of the law deal with the seizure of assets, including
provisions to give a new police unit greater powers to freeze and confiscate
funds and property as well as greater powers to obtain information. Companies
can also face penalties, ranging from fines and suspension to the loss of
business licenses.
One investment manager at a Hong Kong-based hedge fund said he expected more
people to come under scrutiny from their bankers now. "I think that if even a
moderate democrat came through the door wanting to invest, you'd be thinking
long and hard after this law,” the fund manager said.
(Additional reporting by Brenna Hughes Neghaiwi in Zurich; Editing by Paritosh
Bansal and Edward Tobin)
[© 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2020 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |