Whether any of these efforts will result in a vaccine capable of
protecting billions of people and ending the global pandemic that
has claimed more than 600,000 lives is still far from clear. All
will require much larger studies to prove they can safely prevent
infection or serious disease.
The vaccine being developed by British drugmaker AstraZeneca <AZN.L>
along with the Oxford University, induced an immune response in all
study participants who received two doses without any worrisome side
effects.
A coronavirus vaccine under development by CanSinoBiologics Inc
<6185.HK> and China's military research unit, likewise showed that
it appears to be safe and induced an immune response in most of the
508 healthy volunteers who got one dose of the vaccine, researchers
reported.
Some 77% of study volunteers experienced side effects like fever or
injection site pain, but none considered to be serious.
Both the AstraZeneca and CanSino vaccines use a harmless cold virus
known as an adenovirus to carry genetic material from the novel
coronavirus into the body. Studies on both vaccines were published
in the journal The Lancet.
"Overall, the results of both trials are broadly similar and
promising," Naor Bar-Zeev and William Moss, two vaccine experts from
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, wrote in a
commentary in The Lancet.
However, the CanSino candidate again showed signs that people who
had previously been exposed to the particular adenovirus in its
vaccine had a reduced immune response.
The study authors called that "the biggest obstacle" for the vaccine
to overcome.
German biotech BioNTech <22UAy.F> and U.S. drugmaker Pfizer Inc <PFE.N>
released details from a small study in Germany of a different type
of vaccine that uses ribonucleic acid (RNA) - a chemical messenger
that contains instructions for making proteins.
The vaccine instructs cells to make proteins that mimic the outer
surface of the coronavirus. The body recognizes these virus-like
proteins as foreign invaders and can then mount an immune response
against the actual virus.
In the not-yet peer reviewed study of 60 healthy adults, the vaccine
induced virus-neutralizing antibodies in those given two doses, a
result in-line with a previous early-stage U.S. trial. The burst of
announcements followed publication last week of results of Moderna
Inc's <MRNA.O> vaccine trial, showing similarly promising early
results. Moderna's vaccine also uses a messenger RNA platform.
"It's encouraging that all these vaccines seem to induce antibodies
in people," said former World Health Organization (WHO) assistant
director-general Marie-Paule Kieny of the French research institute
Inserm. "This proves that the science is moving forward very
quickly, which is a good sign."
[to top of second column] |
'LONG WAY TO GO'
None of these leading contenders has shown side effects that could sideline
their efforts so far, but all must still prove they are safe and effective in
trials involving thousands of subjects, including those at high-risk for severe
COVID-19, such as the elderly and people with diabetes.
Historically, just 6% of vaccine candidates end up making it to market, often
after a years-long testing process. Vaccine makers hope to dramatically compress
that timeline through faster trials and by manufacturing at scale even before
the products prove successful.
Several manufacturers have U.S. government backing with a goal of having a
coronavirus vaccine by year's end as cases continue to rise at a record pace.
The Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine is one of 150 in development globally, but is
considered the most advanced. Late-stage trials have begun in Brazil and South
Africa and are due to start in the United States, where the infection prevalence
is highest.
In its Phase I trial, the vaccine induced so-called neutralizing antibodies -
the kind that stop the virus from infecting cells - in 91% of individuals a
month after they got one dose, and in 100% of subjects who got a second dose.
These levels were on par with the antibodies produced by people who survived
COVID-19 - a key benchmark of potential success.
Oxford researcher Sarah Gilbert said the trial could not determine whether one
or two doses would be needed to provide immunity.
The vaccine, known as AZD1222, also induced the body to make T cells -
activating a second part of the immune system that experts increasingly believe
will be important for a lasting immune response.
Recent studies show that some recovered patients who tested negative for
coronavirus antibodies developed T cells in response to their infection.
Scientists think both are important aspects of an effective coronavirus vaccine.
Dr Mike Ryan, head of WHO's emergencies program, said the generation of both
T-cell and neutralizing antibody responses was positive, adding, "there is a
long way to go."
Open https://graphics.reuters.com/HEALTH-CORONAVIRUS/yxmvjqywprz/index.html in
an external browser for a Reuters graphic on vaccines and treatments in
development.
(Reporting by Julie Steenhuysen; additional reporting by Alistair Smout,
Pushkala Aripaka, Kate Kelland, Ankur Banerjee, Roxanne Liu, Stephanie Nebehay
and Nancy Lapid; editing by Peter Henderson and Bill Berkrot)
[© 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2020 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |