| 
						
						
							
							
							Lincoln Daily News 
							welcomes letters of appreciation, information and 
							opinion on matters pertaining to the community. 
							 
							  
							
							
							Controversial issues: 
							
							
							As a 
							community we need to be able to talk openly about 
							matters that affect the quality of our lives. The 
							most effective and least offensive manner to get 
							your point across is to stick to the issue 
							and refrain from commenting on another person's 
							opinion. Letters that deviate from focusing on the 
							issue may be rejected or edited and marked as such. 
              
              Submit a letter to the editor online | 
                    You may also send your letters by email to  
                    ldneditor@lincolndailynews.com 
                    or by U.S. postal mail:
                     
              Letters to the EditorLincoln Daily News
 601 Keokuk St.
 Lincoln, IL  62656
 
              Letters must include the writer's 
              name, telephone number, and postal address or email address (we 
              will not publish address or phone number information). 
              Lincoln Daily News reserves the right to edit letters to 
              reduce their size or to correct obvious errors.
              Lincoln Daily News reserves the right to reject any letter for 
              any reason. Lincoln Daily News will publish as 
              many acceptable letters as space allows. | 
        
            | Dear Mayor Goodman & Lincoln City Council members, 
 I know many of you, but for the sake of anyone I do not know, my 
			name is Blinn Bates. I live in the City of Lincoln, own a home here, 
			my children attend school here, and I own and operate a business 
			here. I proudly attended District #27 schools, graduated from LCHS, 
			and have made Lincoln my home since my graduation from law school. I 
			now own and operate a business that my Grandfather and others 
			started in Lincoln in 1972.
 
 I contact you today as a lifelong citizen of this City, and a 
			concerned one. The Council will take up for consideration on March 
			2, 2020 the “City Administrator’s Proposed Resolution Amendment to 
			Add Language to New Section 8, ‘Being kept apprised of all City 
			Operations.’” This Agenda item first appeared on the Committee of 
			the Whole Agenda dated February 25, 2019. While the title of the 
			Agenda item is innocent enough, the language of the actual Ordinance 
			does much more than what is indicated.
 
 Along with the change that is specifically stated within the Agenda 
			item, the language of the Ordinance would substantially reduce the 
			job responsibilities of the City Administrator by 1) eliminating the 
			responsibility of the Administrator to ensure meeting agendas are 
			prepared; 2) removing supervisory responsibility of City department 
			heads; and 3) eliminating responsibility for preparation of the City 
			budget.
 
 If these changes to the job description of the City Administrator 
			are accepted by the Council and this Ordinance is passed, the 
			position of City Administrator will be deemed useless. The City 
			would essentially be paying Ms. Kavelman to hold a job title with no 
			substantive job responsibilities.
 
 I believe the position of City Administrator is a vitally important 
			one for our community to grow and thrive, and I have seen, 
			firsthand, the benefits of a talented Administrator. The annual 
			budget of the City of Lincoln is approximately $22,500,000. You will 
			not find a CEO of a private company of that magnitude that is not 
			highly qualified, extremely talented, and well trained to perform 
			the demanding tasks of their position. In order to find someone that 
			possesses those traits, it requires sufficient compensation. This is 
			not a position that should be bargain-shopped.
 
            [to top of second column in this letter] | 
            
            
             
            The individual that currently occupies the position 
			of City Administrator possesses none of the necessary qualifications 
			for the position, and is not capable to perform the tasks the 
			position requires. The fact that the Council is even considering 
			passing this Ordinance signifies the agreement of each and every one 
			of you that Ms. Kavelman is not capable of doing the job that she 
			was hired to perform. Neutering the position itself to avoid Ms. 
			Kavelman being held accountable to perform the tasks she was hired 
			to accomplish is not the answer. 
 
            If I were hired by a trucking company to drive a 
			semi-truck and haul freight, that trucking company would be in a 
			precarious position because I do not possess the necessary skills to 
			drive a semi-truck. I could have the best of intentions, but, even 
			if I were able to get the semi moving down the road, I would be 
			putting my employer and everyone I encountered at risk. My employer 
			would likely get sued when I injure someone or lose control and hit 
			an unsuspecting pedestrian. I would also more than likely cause my 
			employer financial harm when I inevitably cause damage to the truck.
			
 When my employer learned that I did not possess the necessary 
			qualifications to do the job, do you think they would give me a 
			raise to just sit in the truck? Absolutely not. My employment would 
			be terminated IMMEDIATELY. The result should be the same in the 
			situation the City Council is faced with.
 
 At some point in time, each and every member of the City Council 
			took an Oath of Office and swore to faithfully discharge the duties 
			of their office. Continuing to allow this charade to continue does 
			not live up to that promise. Spending another dime of taxpayer 
			dollars on an obviously incapable employee does not, in my opinion, 
			fulfill the obligations you all have made.
 
 The passage of this Ordinance is not the answer. Deep down, I 
			believe each of you knows what the answer is. For yourselves, for 
			the Citizens of the City of Lincoln, for the businesses that we 
			still have, and for the future of the City, I implore you to do the 
			right thing.
 
 Sincerely,
 Blinn Bates
 
 Editor's note: To allow a balanced perspective, Lincoln Daily 
			News offered the council an opportunity to respond to Bates' letter, 
			which arrived Wednesday evening, but received no response.
 [Posted 
            
			February 29, 
			2020]
             
            
            Click here to send a note to the editor about this letter.
			 |