On
Saturday, the group sent out a statement saying it is enlisting
BMI, the performing rights organization that oversees public use
of the song, in their quest to keep the track from being used
for politically partisan purposes. And the band says there'll be
a lawsuit if the president continues using the song without a
license.
This could be the last time President Donald Trump uses Stones
songs," reads the headline to a release sent out by the Stones'
reps. The statement reads, in part: "Despite cease & desist
directives to Donald Trump in the past, the Rolling Stones are
taking further steps to exclude him using their songs at any of
his future political campaigning. The Stones' legal team [is]
working with BMI... BMI (has) notified the Trump campaign on
behalf of the Stones that the unauthorized use of their songs
will constitute a breach of its licensing agreement. If Donald
Trump disregards the exclusion and persists, then he would face
a lawsuit for breaking the embargo and playing music that has
not been licensed.
As these disputes have arisen, at issue is whether a song's use
in a campaign rally is covered by a blanket license held by the
host venue for all performance purposes. BMI is joining the
Stones in contending that the Trump campaign is subject to a
license specifically established for political uses, which
allows songwriters to object to and withhold use.
Jodie Thomas, BMI's executive director of corporate
communications, clarified the performing rights org's position
for Variety Saturday after the Stones' statement was released.
"BMI's Political Entities License was implemented about ten
years ago to cover political campaigns," Thomas says. "Since
many political events and rallies are often held at places that
don't typically require a music license, such as airport hangars
or community fields, a Political Entities License ensures that
wherever the campaign stops, it is in compliance with copyright
law. A venue license was never intended to cover political
campaigns. So if a campaign attempts to rely on a venue license
to cover its music use, there's risk involved.
Continued Thomas, "BMI licenses political campaigns and events
through its Political Entities or Organizations License, which
clearly states that a campaign cannot rely on a venue license to
authorize its performance of an excluded work. Therefore, a
political campaign cannot and should not try to circumvent BMI's
withdrawal of musical works under its Political Entities License
by attempting to rely on another license.
News of the Stones and BMI working together on the issue was
first reported by Deadline.
In a statement released earlier to Variety and Deadline, BMI
said: "The Trump campaign has a Political Entities License which
authorizes the public performance of more than 15 million
musical works in BMI's repertoire wherever campaign events
occur. There is a provision, however, that allows BMI to exclude
musical works from the license if a songwriter or publisher
objects to its use by a campaign. BMI has received such an
objection and sent a letter notifying the Trump campaign that
the Rolling Stones' works have been removed from the campaign
license, and advising the campaign that any future use of these
musical compositions will be in breach of its license agreement
with BMI.
News of the Stones taking up the fight to have their song
excluded from campaign appearances follows on the heels of the
Tom Petty family uniting last weekend to release a statement
objecting to "I Won't Back Down" at the president's contentious
campaign rally in Tulsa. Brendon Urie soon followed with a
strongly worded statement condemning Trump's use of the Panic!
at the Disco song "High Hopes" at the same rally. The long list
of musicians who've previously publicly objected to Trump
campaign song use includes Neil Young and R.E.M.'s Michael Stipe.
Left unaddressed, as it has been since Trump began using "You
Can't Always Get What You Want" at the end of his campaign
speeches in 2016, is what message the candidate even intends to
send with a song whose very title expresses the thought that
expectations should be tempered.
[© 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2020 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|
|