The
European Commission said in its 2017 ruling that the tax deal,
which covered the period from May 2006 to June 2014, meant
almost three-quarters of Amazon's business went untaxed.
The EU competition watchdog said the Grand Duchy allowed the
U.S. online retailer to shift a significant portion of its
profits from a subsidiary to a holding company without paying
tax, giving the company an unfair advantage.
At issue was the royalty paid by the subsidiary Amazon EU on
certain intellectual property rights to Amazon Europe Holding
Technologies, a company which the European Union said had no
employees, no offices and no business activities.
Amazon said in its filing to the General Court that the EU had
not proven its case, which it claims is riddled with legal and
factual errors. The hearing in Luxembourg, of case T-318/18,
will run to Friday.
The company said the EU ruling also breached principles of legal
certainty, because it relied on a flawed reference framework.
It accused EU enforcers of discrimination by using 2017 OECD
guidelines for a tax deal agreed with Luxembourg in 2003. In
addition, Amazon said the EU has no case as the 10-year
limitation period has expired.
Apple <AAPL.O>, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles <FCHA.MI> , Starbucks
<SBUX.O> and scores of other multinationals have also been
caught in the EU crackdown in recent years over their tax deals
with countries in the bloc.
Starbucks won its fight in September last year after the General
Court backed its arguments while Fiat Chrysler lost. Apple is
still waiting for a ruling.
(Reporting by Foo Yun Chee; Editing by Jan Harvey)
[© 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2020 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|
|