OPEC's pact with Russia falls apart, sending oil into
tailspin
Send a link to a friend
[March 07, 2020] By
Rania El Gamal, Alex Lawler and Olesya Astakhova
VIENNA (Reuters) - A three-year pact
between OPEC and Russia ended in acrimony on Friday after Moscow refused
to support deeper oil cuts to cope with the outbreak of coronavirus and
OPEC responded by removing all limits on its own production.
Oil prices plunged 10% as the development revived fears of a 2014 price
crash, when Saudi Arabia and Russia fought for market share with U.S.
shale oil producers, which have never participated in output limiting
pacts.
Brent has lost about a third of its value this year, tumbling towards
$45 a barrel, its lowest since 2017, putting oil-dependent nations and
many oil firms under heavy strain as the global economy reels due to the
virus outbreak, which has dampened business activity and stopped people
traveling.
"From April 1 neither OPEC nor non-OPEC have restrictions," Russian
Energy Minister Alexander Novak told reporters after marathon talks at
the OPEC headquarters in Vienna on Friday.
Saudi Energy Minister Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman told reporters when
asked whether the kingdom had plans to increase production: "I will keep
you wondering".
The failure of talks may have more far reaching implications as OPEC's
de facto leader Saudi Arabia and Russia have used oil talks to build a
broader political partnership in the last few years after effectively
supporting opposite sides in the Syrian war.
"Russia's refusal to support emergency supply cuts would effectively and
fatally undermine OPEC+'s ability to play the role of oil price
stabilizing swing producer," said Bob McNally, founder of Rapidan Energy
Group.
"It will gravely rupture the budding Russian-Saudi financial and
political rapprochement. The result will be higher oil price volatility
and geopolitical volatility," he said.
SHALE SLOWDOWN
Beyond Moscow and Riyadh's ties, plunging oil prices will put pressure
on U.S. shale producers, whose output costs are much higher than those
of Russian and Saudi production, even though many shale producers are
well hedged against price falls.
[to top of second column] |
The logo of the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries
(OPEC) sits outside its headquarters ahead of the OPEC and NON-OPEC
meeting, Austria December 6, 2019. REUTERS/Leonhard Foeger/File
Photo
"This crisis has revealed that Saudi is not willing to keep a floor under shale
and other producers. They are expediting the slowdown on shale," said Christyan
Malek, head of JP Morgan oil and gas research for Europe, Middle East and
Africa.
The OPEC+ talks collapsed after OPEC effectively presented Russia with an
ultimatum on Thursday, offering it a choice of accepting a deal with much bigger
than expected cuts or no deal at all.
Forecasts for 2020 demand growth have been slashed but Moscow has long argued it
was too early to assess the impact. Sources said Novak delivered the same
message on Friday.
OPEC ministers said on Thursday they backed an additional 1.5 million barrels
per day (bpd) of oil cuts until the end of 2020, in addition to rolling over
existing cuts of 2.1 million bpd. That would have meant removing a total of
about 3.6 million bpd from the market, or 3.6% of global supply.
Moscow rejected the proposal on Friday, saying it was only willing to extend
existing OPEC+ cuts of 2.1 million bpd, which were due to expire at the end of
March. But in response, OPEC even refused to extend the existing cuts.
The Kremlin said on Friday President Vladimir Putin had no immediate plans to
talk to the Saudi leadership, an announcement that dashed hopes that a deal
could be salvaged at the very top.
The collapse of the deal means OPEC members and non-OPEC producers can in theory
pump at will in an oversupplied market.
"This is an unexpected development that falls far below our worst case scenario
and will create one of the most severe oil price crises in history," said
Bjoernar Tonhaugen of Rystad Energy.
(Additional reporting by Shadia Nasralla and Ahmad Ghaddar; Editing by Edmund
Blair and Dmitry Zhdannikov)
[© 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2020 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |