Coronavirus forces U.S. lawmakers to overcome divide
Send a link to a friend
[March 18, 2020]
By Andy Sullivan and David Morgan
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - With coronavirus
cases reported in all 50 U.S. states, lawmakers in Washington are
working to limit the economic damage from the epidemic. To do so, they
must overcome another problem - partisan gridlock.
The Republican-controlled Senate is due to take up a multi-billion
dollar aid package on Wednesday that bolsters safety-net programs and
provides free testing for the respiratory disease.
The Democratic-controlled House of Representatives passed the package by
an overwhelming bipartisan margin on Saturday.
Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell is urging his colleagues to
approve it quickly, despite their qualms.
"Gag and vote for it," he said at a news conference on Tuesday.
That may be difficult for some Senate Republicans, who worry that its
sick-leave provisions could heap costs on small businesses. Others have
objected that it does not cover those who work at corporations that
employ more than 500 people.
"I'm pretty concerned with the House bill making a bad situation worse
in our economy," Republican Senator James Lankford said on Tuesday.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92bd9/92bd97349e58eea24b06d09948a76625d7eb7668" alt=""
Still, the Senate is expected to approve the bill this week and
immediately turn to a third effort, after U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven
Mnuchin privately warned that unemployment could hit 20% if Congress
does not act.
The third package could include popular items, like $1,000 checks to
Americans, and less popular items, such as an expensive bailout for
airlines that risk falling into bankruptcy.
It was unclear when that would pass or how soon Americans would get the
money, but Trump took to Twitter early Wednesday morning to push the
effort.
"For the people that are now out of work because of the important and
necessary containment policies, for instance the shutting down of
hotels, bars and restaurants, money will soon be coming to you," Trump
wrote.
Mindful of the backlash to the 2008 bank rescue package, Republicans
working on the third effort say it does not amount to a bailout of the
industry.
[to top of second column]
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76e25/76e2536776e71b49903ca71e2a832ac7fe1b796e" alt=""
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) speaks to members of
the news media while walking into his office, as Mayor Muriel Bowser
declared a State of Emergency due to the coronavirus disease
(COVID-19), on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., March 17, 2020.
REUTERS/Tom Brenner
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe7e5/fe7e5341e722602e326de6e092687ad7dd86a35e" alt=""
"Chairman Shelby opposes bailouts," said Blair Taylor, a spokeswoman
for Republican Senator Richard Shelby, who is working on the effort.
Disputes over taxes and spending have repeatedly brought Washington
to a standstill over the past decade, but lawmakers so far have
overcome their partisan divisions to confront the crisis.
Congress quickly approved an initial $8.3 billion package to boost
the medical response to the pandemic, and the House-passed bill
enjoyed broad support from both Republicans and Democrats.
Sick-leave and family-leave provisions alone in the House-passed
legislation would cost $105 billion, according to the Joint
Committee on Taxation.
The third effort could dwarf that figure. Mnuchin said it could cost
$1.3 trillion - surpassing the $838 billion Recovery Act of 2009,
which passed Congress with only a handful of Republican votes.
Conservatives like Republican Senator Tom Cotton are calling for the
third package to include expanded safety-net benefits.
Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer, meanwhile, has proposed
spending $750 billion on further safety-net enhancements, such as
emergency child care for health workers, and House Speaker Nancy
Pelosi said on Tuesday that the third package should include
benefits for self-employed workers.
Lawmakers from both parties also have lined up against Trump's
proposed payroll tax cut on the grounds that it would take too long
to make a difference and would not help those who lose their jobs.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26ddf/26ddf39de51d0f4743d0f0737e1fa20407ebe235" alt=""
(Reporting by Andy Sullivan and David Morgan; Additional reporting
by Richard Cowan and Susan Heavey; Editing by Christopher Cushing
and Angus MacSwan)
[© 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2020 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |