A U.S. recession? Probably. Depression? Only if the virus is untamed
Send a link to a friend
[March 28, 2020]
By Howard Schneider
WASHINGTON - A U.S. recession may already
be underway. Could it be worse?
The Great Depression that began with a stock market crash in 1929 and
lasted until 1933 scarred a generation with massive unemployment and
plummeting economic output.
It reshaped America, shifting migration patterns, and spawning new
styles of music, art and literature. Under President Franklin Delano
Roosevelt, however, it also prompted creation of an array of programs
like unemployment insurance, Social Security retirements benefits, and
bank deposit insurance that make a repeat unlikely.
The unpredictable and unprecedented path of the coronavirus has drawn
parallels with the Depression, in particular with predictions that the
rise in unemployment and the percentage drop in economic output could
rival those seen in the 1930s.
But for that to happen, the jawdropping numbers likely to be recorded in
coming weeks - millions thrown out of work, double-digit declines in
gross domestic product - would need to be both deep and sustained over
years, not months.
"There is no specific definition of a depression," said Bernard Baumohl,
chief global economist of the Economic Outlook Group. But "it's palpably
different," than a recession in terms of its length and depth.
In the Great Depression for example, the United States shed 20% of its
jobs over three years, four times the share lost in the 2007 to 2009
Great Recession.
Over the four years of the Great Depression nearly a third of U.S.
output disappeared. While some economists think U.S. annualized output
in the April to June period may fall 14% or more, few think that type of
decline will actually persist over time.
Government spending makes a difference. Unemployment claims have
skyrocketed, but so has the amount of money the government plans to
transfer to people and companies big and small.
[to top of second column]
|
A deli is seen closed, due to the outbreak of the coronavirus
disease (COVID-19) in the Brooklyn borough of New York City, U.S.,
March 26, 2020. REUTERS/Stephen Yang/File Photo
These "stabilizers" have proved powerful in past downturns.
Central banks matter too. Federal Reserve policy mistakes and
failure to prevent a run of bank closures arguably contributed to
the Great Depression.
This time, as in 2007, the Fed and global central banks have moved
to soak the economy in cash and enact new programs to try to limit
the risk of business failures and sustained unemployment.
The most important next step, a growing body of economists and
policymakers say, is fixing America's public health response. A
haphazard patchwork of restrictions across states and a
slow-to-mobilize White House could make coronavirus' impacts worse,
health experts say.
President Donald Trump's push to "reopen" the economy quickly
carries risks. Lifting lockdown restrictions too early could cause a
second wave of the disease, according to a China-focused study
published this week in the Lancet Public Health Journal.
The higher the toll of the virus, and the longer the outbreak lasts,
the more damage to the economy.
"The first order of business will be to get the spread of the virus
under control and then resume economic activity," Fed chair Jerome
Powell said on Thursday.
(Reporting by Howard Schneider; Editing by Heather Timmons and
Andrea Ricci)
[© 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2020 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|