The justices sent the case back to the San
Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to take a
second look at it after the Supreme Court ruled on March 23 in a
similar lawsuit by Allen against Comcast Corp that the appeals
court assessed the claims of racial bias using the wrong test.
Comcast and Charter had refused to carry channels operated by
Allen's Entertainment Studios Networks. Allen is black.
The cases centered on whether under the Civil Rights Act of
1866, a post-Civil War law that forbids racial discrimination in
business contracts, lawsuits like Allen's must show early on in
the litigation that a failed deal was solely the result of
discrimination. The 9th Circuit ruled in 2018 that
discriminatory intent could be merely one factor among others.
The justices in the Comcast case unanimously found that to
prevail "a plaintiff must initially plead and ultimately prove
that, but for race, it would not have suffered."
The cable operators said their business decisions were based on
capacity constraints, not race, and that Allen's channels,
including Justice Central.TV and Cars.TV, did not show
sufficient promise or customer demand to merit distribution.
Entertainment Studios Networks, which sued Charter in Los
Angeles federal court in 2016, attributed the rejections
primarily to racial discrimination. Comcast and Charter called
the lawsuits a "scam" and sought to have them dismissed.
(Reporting by Andrew Chung; Editing by Will Dunham)
[© 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2020 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|
|