U.S. and Europe spar over next stage of aircraft subsidy
dispute
Send a link to a friend
[May 07, 2020] By
David Lawder and Philip Blenkinsop
WASHINGTON/
BRUSSELS (Reuters) - The United
States said there was "no valid basis" for the European Union to
retaliate against U.S. goods in a long-running subsidy row after Boeing
lost state tax breaks, but the EU said it was pressing ahead with its
demand for tariffs.
The transatlantic dispute over support for Europe's Airbus <AIR.PA> and
U.S. rival Boeing <BA.N> has already led to U.S. tariffs on European
goods and could lead to a tit-for-tat EU response.
The United States said on Wednesday it had notified the World Trade
Organization (WTO) that it had fully complied with WTO findings by
repealing tax breaks for Boeing in Washington state.
Washington state's legislature in March repealed the preferential
aerospace tax break first introduced 16 years ago, which saved Boeing
some $118 million in 2018 based on its published jetliner revenue.
The WTO has found the world's two largest planemakers received billions
of dollars of unfair subsidies in a pair of cases dating back to 2004.
Last year it allowed the United States to levy tariffs on $7.5 billion
worth of EU goods, including aircraft, wines and cheese, due to Airbus
subsidies that it had deemed illegal.
Now it is considering whether to grant similar rights to the EU in a
parallel case involving illegal support for Boeing.
"With Washington State’s repeal of this relatively minor tax reduction,
the United States has fully implemented the WTO’s recommendation, ending
this dispute," U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer said. "This
step ensures that there is no valid basis for the EU to retaliate
against any U.S. goods."
Wednesday's formal U.S. submission to the WTO aims to neutralize the
EU's demand for some $10 billion in annual tariffs, USTR said.
But the EU's executive Commission rejected the move and said the United
States remained out of step with the WTO's rule-setting Dispute
Settlement Body.
"The EU does not agree with the U.S. unilateral assertion that it has
fully implemented the DSB recommendations and rulings in this dispute,"
it said.
The EU said it was still studying the state tax repeal, but listed other
measures where it said the United States had failed to comply with WTO
rulings on aid for Boeing, including research support from NASA and the
Pentagon.
[to top of second column] |
The Boeing logo is displayed on a screen, at the New York Stock
Exchange (NYSE) in New York, U.S., August 7, 2019. REUTERS/Brendan
McDermid
The United States denies that any other measures are outstanding in the Boeing
case and said on Wednesday that the abolition of tax breaks brought the marathon
case to a close.
EU TARIFF RULING AWAITED
The spat brings the aircraft industry a step closer to an expanded tariff war.
The United States raised tariffs on Airbus planes to 15% from 10% on March 17,
though the immediate impact is muted as many airlines delay deliveries due to
the pandemic.
The WTO is expected to issue a decision on the EU tariff request in June.
EU officials have emphasized their desire to negotiate an end to the dispute,
while U.S. sources have said this has not led to concrete proposals.
Airbus has said it is for the WTO to rule on compliance while Boeing says it has
advocated against its own economic interest for the tax breaks to be repealed to
protect rules-based trade.
Boeing was reported to have lobbied in the past for the tax breaks to be
introduced and later extended, while Airbus lost a separate bid to prove they
were a more serious WTO violation.
The WTO decision on EU retaliation is expected to arrive well before any
compliance proceeding could be completed. Even without an appeal, it could take
the WTO until mid- to late 2021 to rule on the compliance issue, experts said.
Boeing last week declined to seek aid from a U.S. government $17-billion
coronavirus relief fund for aerospace and other national security-linked firms
after it raised $25 billion in a corporate bond offering.
The USTR launched formal negotiations with Britain on Tuesday for a post-Brexit
free-trade agreement.
(Additional reporting by Andrea Shalal, David Shepardson, Tim Hepher; editing by
Diane Craft and Jason Neely)
[© 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2020 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |