U.S. hospitals slash use of drug championed by Trump as coronavirus
treatment
Send a link to a friend
[May 29, 2020]
By Michael Erman and Deena Beasley
NEW YORK (Reuters) - U.S. hospitals said
they have pulled way back on the use of hydroxychloroquine, the malaria
drug touted by President Donald Trump as a COVID-19 treatment, after
several studies suggested it is not effective and may pose significant
risks.
Early hopes for the decades-old drug were based in part on laboratory
experiments and its anti-inflammatory and antiviral properties. But its
efficacy has so far failed to pan out in human trials, and at least two
studies suggest it may increase the risk of death.
Several hospitals that two months ago told Reuters they were using
hydroxychloroquine frequently for patients with COVID-19 have cut back.
Orders for the drug have dropped to a tenth of the late-March peak, to
about 125,000 pills last week, said Vizient Inc, a drug buyer for about
half of U.S. hospitals.
The significant decrease in use is a sign that U.S. physicians no longer
believe the drug's potential benefit outweighs the risks. Some European
governments this week banned hydroxychloroquine use for COVID-19
patients.
Dr. Thomas McGinn, deputy physician in chief at Northwell Health, New
York's largest healthcare system, told Reuters it decided to stop
prescribing hydroxychloroquine at its 23 hospitals in mid-April, after
clinical data began to emerge.
"People were in our hospitals, they were dying, and we wanted to do
something," he recalled. "But the minute the data came out ... showing
no benefit and potential harm, I think we all needed to step back," he
said.
British medical journal The Lancet last week published an analysis of
96,000 COVID-19 patients showing those treated with hydroxychloroquine
or the related chloroquine had higher risk of death and heart rhythm
problems.
The observational study does not have the rigor of a randomized,
placebo-controlled trial, but its size made it influential.
Seattle's University of Washington hospital system has also stopped
recommending hydroxychloroquine as a coronavirus standard of care,
noting in its latest treatment guidelines that "recent clinical studies
have not demonstrated virologic or clinical benefits."
[to top of second column]
|
The drug hydroxychloroquine, pushed by U.S. President Donald Trump
and others in recent months as a possible treatment to people
infected with the coronavirus disease (COVID-19), is displayed at
the Rock Canyon Pharmacy in Provo, Utah, U.S. May 27, 2020.
REUTERS/George Frey/File Photo
Trump has been a particularly strong supporter of hydroxychloroquine,
calling it a "game changer" early on. He later said he was taking
the drug to prevent infection despite no scientific evidence it
could do so, after people who worked at the White House tested
positive for COVID-19. He has also urged others to try the medicine.
Proponents of the drug as a COVID-19 treatment argue it may need to
be administered at an earlier stage in the disease to be effective.
Doctors are waiting for studies that might prove that.
Results could be released as early as this week for two of the
University of Minnesota's three hydroxychloroquine trials, according
to Dr. Radha Rajasingham, lead researcher for one of the studies.
"Everyone's idea of the safety of this drug kind of changed
overnight," Rajasingham said, referring to an April 24 U.S. Food and
Drug Administration warning of increased risk of heart rhythm
problems. "We have really had trouble enrolling" patients in the
trials, she added.
Other studies comparing the drug to a placebo are expected later.
"We are still waiting for randomized, controlled data, but there is
much less enthusiasm now for hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin and
some of the other treatments that people have been touting," said
Dr. Timothy Brewer, an infectious disease specialist at the
University of California, Los Angeles, which now recommends the
drug's use only in clinical trials.
"There is enough observational data to suggest that they have no
benefit, or a small benefit, and there are some risks."
(Reporting by Michael Erman, Editing by Peter Henderson and Bill
Berkrot)
[© 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2020 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|