Explainer: Can Trump call in troops to quell Election Day unrest?
Send a link to a friend
[November 02, 2020]
By Jan Wolfe
(Reuters) - There have been pockets of
unrest in battleground states ahead of the showdown between President
Donald Trump and his Democratic challenger, Joe Biden, in Tuesday's
election.
On Saturday, peaceful participants at a rally in North Carolina to turn
out the vote were pepper-sprayed by law enforcement officials. The Biden
campaign canceled two events after a caravan of vehicles with Trump
campaign flags swarmed a bus carrying campaign workers in Texas on
Friday.
Trump, who previously declined to commit to a peaceful transfer of power
if he decides Tuesday's election results are fraudulent, could bring in
the military or federal agents to quell civil unrest on Election Day.
Here is a look at the laws that give Trump authority in this area, and
the limitations on his power.
WHAT IS THE INSURRECTION ACT?
Under the U.S. Constitution, governors of U.S. states have primary
authority to maintain order within state borders. The 1878 Posse
Comitatus Act bars the federal military from participating in domestic
law enforcement.
The Insurrection Act, an exception to the Posse Comitatus Act dating
back to 1807, permits the president to send in U.S. forces to suppress a
domestic insurrection.
The Insurrection Act has been invoked dozens of times in U.S. history,
but rarely since the civil rights movement of the 1960s.
It was last invoked in 1992 by President George H.W. Bush when the
acquittal of four Los Angeles police officers in the beating of Black
motorist Rodney King led to deadly riots. California's governor
supported Bush's use of the law.
The act gives a president "awesome powers" and should be used as a last
resort, said retired Army Major General John Altenburg, now a Washington
lawyer.
DID TRUMP INVOKE THE ACT IN RESPONSE TO THIS YEAR'S ANTI-RACISM
PROTESTS?
Trump considered invoking the act in response to violence and looting at
mostly peaceful anti-racism protests in June. Trump dropped the idea
after public pushback from Defense Secretary Mark Esper.
Instead, Trump sent U.S. Department of Homeland Security agents to
cities like Washington and Portland, Oregon.
Those agents had military-style equipment but they were civilians and
not members of the armed forces.
In the event of unrest on Election Day on Tuesday or in the ensuing
days, Trump is more likely to activate those federal agents than the
military, said Jimmy Gurulé, a University of Notre Dame law professor
and former Justice Department official.
To do so, Trump would need to cite some violation of federal law that
the agents are policing against. The DHS agents sent to Portland earlier
this year were charged with enforcing a law against vandalizing federal
property like courthouses.
CAN TRUMP ACTIVATE THE NATIONAL GUARD?
Yes, the U.S. government could activate, or "federalize," the Army
National Guard, a reserve force of part-time soldiers. Those civilian
soldiers are usually activated by governors, but federal law also allows
the U.S. government to mobilize them.
[to top of second column]
|
President Donald Trump speaks during a campaign rally at Hickory
Regional Airport in Hickory, North Carolina U.S., November 1, 2020.
REUTERS/Carlos Barria
Once federalized, National Guard soldiers are under the full command
and control of the defense secretary until they are returned to
state status.
This year, many state governors have activated the National Guard to
respond to the coronavirus pandemic and support local law
enforcement in quelling disturbances.
SO TRUMP NEED NOT HAVE A GOVERNOR’S APPROVAL FOR SENDING IN TROOPS?
Right. Under the Insurrection Act, if a president determines that a
rebellion has made it "impracticable" to enforce U.S. law through
ordinary judicial proceedings, he may activate the armed forces
without a governor's approval "to enforce those laws or to suppress
the rebellion."
Historically, presidents and governors have generally agreed on the
need for troops.
Trump can activate DHS agents, who are federal government employees,
or the National Guard, without state approval.
There are limits, however, on the president's power. Federal law
makes it illegal for the military or other federal agents to
interfere with an election. Deploying the military or DHS to polling
places is illegal, for example.
CAN A COURT BLOCK A PRESIDENT'S USE OF FORCE?
Yes, but courts have historically been reluctant to second-guess a
president’s military declarations, said Robert Chesney, a law
professor at the University of Texas.
"When a president claims that the facts on the ground warrant
invocation of the Insurrection Act, courts ordinarily would not
second-guess this," Chesney said. Judges, however, could break with
precedent if they believed Trump had relied on false claims to
justify the use of force, he said.
If Trump sends in DHS or other federal agents, they must respect the
constitutional rights of civilians. Advocacy groups like the
American Civil Liberties Union accused the agents in Portland of
making arrests that violated the constitutional rights of protesters
and journalists.
But the Trump administration had the lawful authority to use the
agents, legal experts said.
(Reporting by Jan Wolfe; Additional reporting by Idrees Ali and Phil
Stewart; Editing by Noeleen Walder, Howard Goller and Peter Cooney)
[© 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2020 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |