California voters to decide fate of gig economy workers
Send a link to a friend
[November 03, 2020]
By Tina Bellon and Lisa Baertlein
(Reuters) - Trend-setting California votes
on the future of the gig economy on Tuesday, deciding whether to back a
ballot proposal by Uber and its allies that would cement app-based food
delivery and ride-hail drivers' status as independent contractors, not
employees.
The measure, known as Proposition 22, marks the culmination of years of
legal and legislative wrangling over a business model that has
introduced millions of people to the convenience of ordering food or a
ride with the push of a button.
Companies describe the contest as a matter of ensuring flexibility for a
new generation of workers who want to choose when and how they work.
Opponents see an effort to exploit workers and avoid employee-related
costs that could amount to more than $392 million each for Uber
Technologies Inc, Lyft Inc, a Reuters calculation showed.
Uber, Lyft, Doordash, Instacart and Postmates, some of whom threaten to
shut down in California if they lose, have poured $202 million into what
has become the most expensive ballot campaign in state history.
"This debate is very emotional for me. I want to keep driving when I
want and for whom I want," said retiree Jan Krueger, 62, who drives
part-time for Lyft in Sacramento and got a "Mom Lyft" tattoo on her
shoulder.
"Everybody is super concerned about (the companies) leaving or raising
prices and not being available in remote areas," Krueger said of her
passengers and driver friends.
The proposition is the app makers' response to a new California law that
requires companies that control how workers do their jobs to classify
those workers as employees.
The app companies argue the law does not apply to them because they are
technology platforms, not hiring entities, and that their drivers
control how they work.
Companies warn they could cut 80% of drivers, double prices and even
leave California, if they are forced to pay benefits including minimum
wage, unemployment insurance, health care and workers' compensation.
Uber, Lyft, DoorDash, Instacart and Postmates also have challenged the
new law in court, but judges so far ruled against them. Uber and Lyft
recently lost an appeal, which narrows their options if Prop 22 fails.
[to top of second column]
|
Michael Gonzales, 35, votes at the Uber Hub polling station, during
the global outbreak of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19), in
Redondo Beach, Los Angeles, California, U.S., November 2, 2020.
REUTERS/Lucy Nicholson
California represents 9%, roughly $1.63 billion, of Uber's 2019
global rides and food delivery gross bookings, and some 16% of
Lyft's total rides.
Prop 22 would leave gig workers as contractors and provide them with
more modest benefits than state law, including minimum pay while
riders are in their cars, healthcare subsidies and accident
insurance.
Company-sponsored surveys have found that more than 70% of current
gig workers do not want to be employees, but labor groups have
questioned those polls, saying drivers are divided.
Los Angeles Uber driver Christine Tringali said the companies'
actions were shameful.
"How can someone fight so hard to avoid paying people a living wage
and giving them job security? We work just as hard as anyone else,"
Tringali said.
Californians are split on the issue. An Oct. 26 poll by UC
Berkeley's Institute of Governmental Studies of over 6,600 state
residents found that 46% of voters would vote in favor of the ballot
measure and 42% against it, with the remainder still undecided. The
poll had a sampling error of 2 percentage points.
First-time voter and college student Jonah Cervantes' mail-in ballot
included a "yes" on Prop 22. He hopes to start driving for Uber or
Lyft in a few months.
"It would be a lot harder for people to just hop on" as new drivers
without Prop 22, said Cervantes.
(Reporting by Tina Bellon in New York and Lisa Baertlein in Los
Angeles; additional reporting by Lucy Nicholson in Los Angeles;
editing by Peter Henderson and Lisa Shumaker)
[© 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2020 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |