U.S. Supreme Court rejects NFL, DirecTV appeal in TV package suit
Send a link to a friend
[November 03, 2020]
By Jan Wolfe
(Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on
Monday refused to hear a bid by the National Football League and
AT&T Inc's DirecTV unit to avoid a proposed class-action antitrust
lawsuit that accuses them of overcharging for a popular satellite
television package.
The NFL and DirecTV had asked the justices to overturn a lower
court's 2019 ruling that revived the suit filed on behalf of
subscribers of "Sunday Ticket," their package that lets NFL fans
watch "out-of-market" games not broadcast in their local television
markets for $294 a season.
The Supreme Court's action means the lawsuit can move forward. Its
action may increase the likelihood of a settlement that would
partially reimburse subscribers.
A batch of lawsuits, filed in 2015 on behalf of DirecTV subscribers,
argued that exclusive agreements between the NFL and DirecTV unlawfully
eliminated competition for the live telecasts.
The cases were consolidated before U.S. District Judge Beverly Reid
O'Connell in Los Angeles, who then dismissed the litigation in 2017 and
ruled that the plaintiffs had not shown that the NFL's arrangement with
DirecTV undermined competition.
O'Connell, who died that same year, decided that the agreements did not
reduce the output of games available to the public. O'Connell also noted
that DirecTV was required to renegotiate its licensing agreement with
the NFL every few years, so competitors had the opportunity to vie for
the television rights.
[to top of second column] |
The NFL logo is
pictured at an event in the Manhattan borough of New York City, New
York, U.S., November 30, 2017. REUTERS/Carlo Allegri/File Photo
The San Francisco-based U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals revived
the case in 2019, finding that lawyers for the subscribers had
plausibly made the case that, absent the agreements, there would be
a stronger market for game broadcasts and many more telecasts would
be made available.
Lawyers for the NFL and DirecTV argued that the litigation "seeks to
overturn arrangements for telecasting NFL Football that have been in
place, and that have served the NFL's hundreds of millions of fans,
for over 25 years."
(Reporting by Jan Wolfe; Editing by Will Dunham)
[© 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2020 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|