Exclusive: Trump policing panel was warned about secretive process
before court ruling
Send a link to a friend
[October 02, 2020]
By Sarah N. Lynch
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Before a U.S.
federal judge on Thursday halted the work of a Trump administration law
enforcement commission - saying it had violated public meetings laws -
the panel had been warned about shutting out public input by several of
its own participants, internal records reviewed by Reuters show.
The commission had planned to deliver a slate of proposals recommending
sweeping new powers for police shortly before the November presidential
election, the documents show. It also called for bolstering due-process
protections for officers accused of wrongdoing, according to draft
proposals reviewed by Reuters.
But the secretive process to produce the planned report drew criticism
from some law enforcement representatives helping draft the document,
internal emails among the participants show. The order to halt the
commission's work, from U.S. District Judge John Bates, came in response
to a lawsuit filed by the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund
(NAACP LDF) alleging the commission failed to give notice of public
hearings and allowed law enforcement groups to have undue influence.

The panel's 18 commissioners include federal, state and local law
enforcement representatives, but no civil rights advocates, defense
attorneys or big-city police officials.
Among the participants who warned the panel about its closed process was
Fayetteville, North Carolina Police Chief Gina Hawkins, a commission
member. In an May 11 email reviewed by Reuters, she told commission
chairman Phil Keith that drafting recommendations without hearing from
all sides created the appearance of a predetermined conclusion.
Then on Aug. 13, she complained the draft contained too many quotes from
Trump and Barr, rather than experts who provided input to the
commission, saying the work "should never be political."
Hawkins declined to comment. Keith did not respond to a request for
comment.
Justice Department spokeswoman Kristina Mastropasqua said that Keith
acknowledged Hawkins' question and told her that the reports would not
be final until all testimony was received.
Two local prosecutors assigned to smaller working groups that support
the commission - John Choi of Ramsey County, Minnesota, and Mark Dupree
of Wyandotte County, Kansas - wrote to the panel on May 29 expressing
concern its recommendations would not sufficiently address "racial
disparities in policing" and would "erode local prosecutorial
discretion."
Choi has since asked for his name to be removed from the final report.
He told Reuters the commission declined to give him access to
recommendations being crafted by other working groups. Dupree did not
respond to a request for comment.
The White House declined to comment on the panel's work or the court
ruling, referring questions to the Justice Department.
Prior to Judge Bates' ruling on Thursday, Mastropasqua declined to
comment on other aspects of the commission's work or the draft proposals
reviewed by Reuters. Department spokeswoman Kerri Kupec declined to
comment on the ruling after it was issued.
In unveiling the panel last year, Trump foreshadowed that it would
produce a report that would be applauded by law enforcement. He told a
conference of the International Association of Police Chiefs (IACP) in
that the administration would begin immediately implementing the
commission's best recommendations once it issued them.
"They'll have them soon," he said, "because most of them already know
many of the answers before they begin; you understand that."
LACK OF ALTERNATIVE INPUT
Concerns about systemic racism in policing were not addressed in any of
the draft sections of the document seen by Reuters.
The lack of diverse viewpoints prompted the NAACP LDF to sue the
commission, Barr and top commission members, accusing them of violating
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) by not providing notice of
public hearings and stacking it with only law enforcement officials.
The government denied the civil rights group access to "a representative
voice on the Commission," Bates wrote in his ruling on Thursday. The
court ordered the panel to halt work and provide timely notice of
meetings, and ordered Barr to appoint a federal official to ensure that
the commission has a "fairly balanced membership." Bates barred the
commission from publishing a report until it had complied with federal
open meetings and transparency laws.
Amid complaints about a lack of diverse input, the commission actively
sought the opinions of law enforcement insiders, commission records
reviewed by Reuters show.
[to top of second column]
|

President Donald Trump greets International Association of
Chiefs of Police (IACP) President Chief Paul Cell prior to
delivering remarks at the International Association of
Chiefs of Police annual conference and expo in Chicago,
Illinois, U.S., October 28, 2019. REUTERS/Leah Mills/File
Photo

Tim Richardson, the lobbyist for the Fraternal Order of Police, the
largest organization of sworn law enforcement, is not publicly named
as a member of any group working on the draft. But an April 10 email
reveals he was introduced as a member of a group developing the
"Respect for Law Enforcement" chapter to others working on the
chapter. His comments are cited in the footnote of an August draft
to support a recommendation urging Congress to craft "a uniform
minimal level of procedural due process" for police.
Richardson did not respond to requests for comment. The Justice
Department said in court papers Richardson was not a member of the
working group but was retained as an expert.
PROPOSING NEW POLICE POWERS
Draft proposals from the commission, obtained by Reuters through
public records requests, offer a window into how Trump's Justice
Department views the role of the law enforcement amid a national
upheaval over police killings of Black men and women.
The commission started its work before the May killing of George
Floyd in Minneapolis, which sparked nationwide protests against
racism and police brutality. Attorney General William Barr in
January said the commission would recommend best practices at a time
when "criminal threats and social conditions have changed the
responsibilities and roles of police officers."
The proposals included allowing officers accused of wrongdoing to
view body camera footage before speaking to internal investigators;
increasing funding for controversial facial recognition
technologies; giving police access to encrypted cell phones; and
increasing penalties for illegal immigration.
The draft recommendations also take aim at "progressive prosecutors"
who advocate for eliminating cash bail and not charging low-level
drug offenses.

Other recommendations urged Congress to bolster due process
protections for police officers accused of wrongdoing and call on
the Justice Department to regularly affirm support for "qualified
immunity," a Supreme Court precedent that protects officers accused
of injuring or killing suspects in civil lawsuits.
Many of the proposals calling for legislative action likely would
not win support from a House of Representatives controlled by
Democrats.
SECOND-GUESSING PROSECUTORS
An August chapter draft made multiple recommendations reflecting the
administration's concerns that some locally elected prosecutors are
going too easy on low-level offenders, such as those accused of
marijuana possession. Among the proposed reforms including calling
on states to establish oversight committees to review charging
decisions.
"When a prosecutor unilaterally decides to not prosecute an entire
category of crimes ... that prosecutor is usurping legislative
authority," it says.
A draft chapter on technology calls for increased funding for facial
recognition technologies, though a government-funded study last year
found had higher rates of error in identifying African-American and
Asian faces.
The draft also recommends a legislative fix to address recent
concerns by the FBI, after it struggled to access the encrypted
iPhone of a Royal Saudi Air Force trainee who killed three American
sailors in a December attack at a U.S. naval base.
"Companies are building electronic devices and platforms that apply
'warrant-proof' encryption," a June draft chapter reads. "Those
companies are blinding the nation to preventable attacks."
(Reporting by Sarah N. Lynch; Editing by Scott Malone and Brian
Thevenot)
[© 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2020 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |