U.S. Supreme Court allows South Carolina vote-by-mail restriction
Send a link to a friend
[October 06, 2020]
By Lawrence Hurley
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme
Court on Monday ensured that a restrictive Republican-backed law in
South Carolina that requires voters to have a witness sign mail-in
ballots will be in place for the Nov. 3 election.
The justices, granting a request by various Republican officials, put on
hold a lower court ruling that had blocked the restriction. The court,
in a brief order, said that ballots already sent would not have to
comply with the signature requirement.
The law was challenged by a group of Democratic voters and the state
Democratic Party, who argued that requiring a witness to sign ballots
would endanger people during the coronavirus pandemic and could decrease
voting.
Various Republican state officials, including members of the state's
election commission, asked the Supreme Court to allow the law to be in
effect for the election after a federal judge on Sept. 18 blocked it
from being implemented for November.
The full Richmond, Virginia-based 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
later upheld the judge's ruling.
Some 150,000 mail-in ballots already have been distributed to South
Carolina voters.
[to top of second column]
|
A U.S. Absentee Voting Ballot is seen in West Bend, Wisconsin, U.S.,
October 2, 2020. REUTERS/Alex Wroblewski
Voting by mail has long been a regular part of American elections
and mail-in ballots are expected to be widely used during the
pandemic as voters seek to avoid Election Day lines and crowds at
polling places.
President Donald Trump, a Republican seeking re-election, has
attacked the integrity of mail-in voting.
Trump has made unsubstantiated claims that mail-in ballots are
especially vulnerable to fraud and suggested without evidence that
their widespread use would lead to a "rigged election."
(Reporting by Lawrence Hurley; Editing by Kim Coghill and Sonya
Hepinstall)
[© 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2020 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |