Challengers, observers and electioneering: the history and rules of U.S.
poll watching
Send a link to a friend
[October 07, 2020]
By Joseph Tanfani and Jarrett Renshaw
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Republicans are
mobilizing thousands of supporters to monitor early voting sites and
ballot drop boxes in November's election, an effort that stretches the
traditional definition of the roles of election observers.
Here's the history of "poll watching" and how the practice may take on
new meaning amid a surge in mail balloting spurred by the coronavirus
pandemic and Republican President Donald Trump's unsubstantiated claims
that mail voting is riddled with fraud.
WHAT IS POLL WATCHING?
Poll watchers are part of U.S. elections dating back to the 18th
century, with their activities controlled by state laws and local rules.
People from both parties keep an eye on the voting - and each other - to
make sure things go smoothly.
State laws call observers inside polling places different things, and
assign them different roles. In some places, poll "watchers" are
different from "challengers," who can point out people they suspect
aren't legal voters. In other states, poll watchers also do the
challenging.
Still other rules set boundaries on how close partisan supporters can
stand outside polling places, as they try to whip up support for their
candidates with signs, leaflets and other advertising.
Complaints about overly aggressive poll watchers are common. Sometimes,
observers have used the ability to challenge voters' qualifications in
ways that discriminate against minorities, which has resulted in some
court actions to end those practices.
In a 1999 city election in Hamtramck, Michigan, for example, challengers
from a civic group called "Citizens for a Better Hamtramck" challenged
40 Arab-Americans who had "dark skin and distinctly Arabic names," who
were then forced by election officials to take an oath to prove they
were citizens, according to a U.S. Justice Department consent decree.
The city agreed to conduct training of its poll workers, and a federal
examiner was appointed to oversee city elections through 2003.
In 1981, a Republican operation put armed men in uniforms emblazoned
with "Ballot Security Task Force" outside polling places in largely
minority areas during a New Jersey state election. After that incident,
the RNC agreed to a consent decree that limited its ballot security
operations.
That decree expired in 2018 after a federal judge declined Democratic
attempts to renew it.
This year marks the first presidential election in nearly four decades
in which the RNC can engage in ballot security activities without prior
review and approval.
WHAT ARE THE RULES?
Regulations on who can "watch" voting, and the powers granted these
observers, vary from state to state. In Pennsylvania, for example, poll
watchers can observe the election - checking turnout and voting machines
-- and also challenge voters by taking their concerns to election
officials. However, these challengers generally are barred from
interacting directly with voters, or from making meritless challenges
that slow down voting.
Qualifications for poll workers also vary. They typically are supposed
to be registered voters; in some states they must be certified in
advance by election officials. North Carolina requires that poll workers
be of "good moral character."
[to top of second column]
|
Poll workers prepare absentee ballots for shipment at the Wake
County Board of Elections on the first day that the state started
mailing them out, in Raleigh, North Carolina, U.S. September 4,
2020. REUTERS/Jonathan Drake/File Photo
Observers also are permitted by law in states that conduct elections
mostly by mail. In Oregon, for example, the law says parties and
candidates can sponsor observers to watch election workers open
ballots and count them, but these monitors must behave in a way that
"will not interfere with an orderly procedure.”
Supporters of parties and candidates may stand outside polling
stations with banners and other political advertising, an activity
known as "electioneering." But that also is subject to laws that
vary state to state.
Generally, these advocates must keep a certain distance from the
entrance, so as not to harass or intimidate voters.
In Ohio the border is 100 feet, and it’s supposed to be marked by
two small American flags. In Florida and Georgia, the boundary is
150 feet.
WHAT IS DIFFERENT ABOUT THIS YEAR?
The COVID-19 pandemic means unprecedented numbers of Americans will
be voting by mail and not in person in 2020.
President Trump has made unfounded claims that these ballots will be
tainted by fraud. His campaign is seeking to recruit thousands of
volunteers to look for irregularities – such as people dropping off
more than one ballot in states like Pennsylvania where that
generally is not allowed.
This effort is testing voting laws designed around in-person
balloting on Election Day, election experts said. There is no
rulebook for monitors trying to enter early polling sites, or
potentially challenging voters in public who are trying to drop off
their ballots, said Terry Madonna, a political science professor at
Franklin & Marshall college in Pennsylvania.
ARE GUNS ALLOWED?
In a year that has seen armed militias confront protestors, some
voting rights advocates are nervous about a return of gun-toting
groups showing up outside polling places.
Some battleground states, including Pennsylvania, Michigan, North
Carolina, Wisconsin and Virginia, are so-called open-carry states
where citizens can carry guns openly in public. There are no laws on
the books in those states explicitly prohibiting people from
carrying firearms into polling places.
Still, state and federal laws make it illegal for anyone to try to
intimidate voters.
Voting rights organizations say they will have thousands of lawyers
standing by who would intervene with local officials or seek court
orders to stop such activity.
(Editing by Soyoung Kim and Marla Dickerson)
[© 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2020 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |