The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of
Appeals will review a judge's order to unseal
sworn testimony related to Epstein, including a
April 2016 deposition from Maxwell and a
deposition by an Epstein accuser.
Maxwell, 58, has said negative publicity from
the disclosure of "intimate, sensitive, and
personal" information from her deposition would
violate her right against self-incrimination,
and imperil a fair trial because jurors might
hold it against her.
The British socialite has pleaded not guilty to
charges she helped Epstein recruit and groom
underage girls as young as 14 years old to
engage in illegal sexual acts in the mid-1990s,
and not guilty to perjury for having denied
involvement under oath.
Maxwell was arrested on July 2 in New Hampshire,
where prosecutors said she had been hiding out.
She has been locked up in a Brooklyn jail after
U.S. District Judge Alison Nathan, who oversees
the criminal case, called her an unacceptable
flight risk. Maxwell's trial is scheduled for
July 2021.
Epstein, a registered sex offender, killed
himself at age 66 in August 2019 at a Manhattan
jail while awaiting trial on sex trafficking
charges.
Maxwell's request to keep the deposition under
wraps is opposed by Virginia Giuffre, who has
said Epstein kept her as a "sex slave" with
Maxwell's help, and that Maxwell could have
invoked her right to remain silent while being
deposed.
[to top of second column]
|
Giuffre is one of Epstein's
most visible public accusers, and believes the
public has a right to see Maxwell's deposition,
which came from Giuffre's civil defamation
lawsuit against her.
That case settled in 2017, and U.S. District
Judge Loretta Preska ordered the deposition
unsealed in July.
Tuesday's hearing will also address a second
Maxwell appeal, from Nathan's refusal to modify
a protective order and let her access
confidential materials produced by the
government.
Maxwell's lawyers hope to use those materials to
convince Preska not to unseal the deposition,
saying the judge deserved to know "just how
prosecutors obtained the deposition material and
who turned it over to them."
Prosecutors countered that Maxwell has shown no
need for the materials, and that her appeal was
a "thinly veiled attempt" to have the appeals
court declare they gathered evidence illegally.
(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York;
Editing by Noeleen Walder and Bill Berkrot)
[© 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2020 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|