COVID-19 complication rates far higher than for flu; open windows,
partitions advised for classrooms
Send a link to a friend
[October 22, 2020]
By Nancy Lapid
(Reuters) - The following is a roundup of
some of the latest scientific studies on the novel coronavirus and
efforts to find treatments and vaccines for COVID-19, the illness caused
by the virus
Higher complication rate with COVID-19 vs flu
Complication rates are higher with severe COVID-19 than with severe flu,
according to a new study. Researchers compared 3,948 adults hospitalized
for COVID-19 with 5,453 hospitalized in previous years with influenza.
The flu patients had higher rates of underlying medical conditions like
heart disease and diabetes. Even so, COVID-19 patients had a more than
five times higher rate of death and about double the need for intensive
care unit admission and number of days in the hospital. They also had
higher rates of 17 different complications including those involving the
lungs, blood, heart, blood vessels, nervous system, kidneys and liver.
The study, published on Tuesday in the U.S. Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention's Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, also found that
the risk for COVID-19 complications was higher among Blacks, Hispanics
and other non-white patients, even after taking age and underlying
medical conditions into consideration. These disparities "provide
further evidence that racial and ethnic minority groups are
disproportionally affected by COVID-19," the researchers said.
Open windows, glass partitions advised for classrooms
Children would be safer from the new coronavirus if classrooms had glass
or plastic partitions fastened to desks, open windows and air
conditioning, researchers say. Using computers to map paths of
potentially virus-containing aerosols through air, they found that
nearly 70% of particles exhaled during speech would exit the room if
windows were open. Barriers between desks roughly 8 feet (2.44 m) apart
would further reduce transmission of those particles. Up to half of
particles generated by coughing or sneezing either land on the floor or
are cleared by air conditioning within 15 minutes, researchers reported
on Tuesday in Physics of Fluids. "Masks ... reduce the number of
particles coming from a person and also change their initial velocity.
Then you want social distancing and hand sanitizing. Then air
conditioning, open windows and glass partitions," study coauthor Khaled
Talaat from the University of New Mexico told Reuters. "No single layer
will do the job." Students at higher risk of COVID-19 complications can
be seated where they are exposed to fewer particles, which would depend
on the air conditioning layout within the room, the researchers noted.
In their model, the back corners were the safest spots.
Jury still out on benefits of convalescent plasma
[to top of second column]
|
A 3D-printed coronavirus model is seen in front of the words
coronavirus disease (Covid-19) on display in this illustration taken
March 25, 2020. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic
Pooled data from 19 studies involving more than 36,000 COVID-19
patients has yielded no definitive answer to whether infusions of
blood plasma from people who have recovered from the disease is
clinically beneficial, an expert panel reported. They searched
medical databases to find studies testing the effectiveness of
so-called convalescent plasma. "We are uncertain" whether
convalescent plasma reduces deaths in hospitalized COVID-19
patients, and it makes "little to no difference" in patients'
symptoms such as need for breathing support within a week after
receiving the treatment, researchers said in the report compiled for
The Cochrane Library. After more time has elapsed, they said, an
effect might become evident. In all cases, the reliability of the
studies was "uncertain," and there was limited information about
serious side effects of the treatment. They noted that more than 130
studies of convalescent plasma therapy were ongoing. "We will
continue to update this review," they said.
Studies conflict on arthritis drug for COVID-19 pneumonia
A handful of studies on whether the rheumatoid arthritis drug
tocilizumab provides clinically meaningful benefit for hospitalized
COVID-19 patients with pneumonia have produced conflicting data. The
medicine - sold as Actemra by Swiss drugmaker Roche - is an antibody
that helps control an inflammation-inducing protein produced by the
immune system called IL-6. Because the life-threatening lung
problems in severe COVID-19 are thought to be related to the immune
system's inflammatory response to the virus, and because Chinese
doctors saw higher death rates in patients with high IL-6 levels,
hospitals began using tocilizumab in the hopes it might help dampen
that response and hasten patients' recovery. Large "observational"
studies - including one published last week and two published on
Tuesday - found that it appears to help. But two more-rigorous
randomized trials published on Tuesday found tocilizumab made no
difference in patients' recovery. An editorial published alongside
three of the studies in JAMA Internal Medicine notes that the
randomized trials had some weaknesses, and it may still turn out
that "blunting the immune response with tocilizumab will reduce
morbidity and mortality over the long haul." But for now, "findings
from the randomized trials ... do not support routine tocilizumab
use in COVID-19."
(Reporting by Nancy Lapid and Linda Carroll; Editing by Bill Berkrot)
[© 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2020 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|