Don't give up on COVID-19 plasma, experts say, after study finds no
benefit
Send a link to a friend
[October 23, 2020]
By Kate Kelland
LONDON (Reuters) - Researchers called on
Friday for more research into using blood from recovered COVID-19
patients - or so-called convalescent plasma - as a potential treatment,
after a small trial of hospitalised patients in India found it was of no
benefit
The Indian results, published in the BMJ British Medical Journal, found
that the plasma, which delivers antibodies from COVID-19 survivors to
infected people, did not help hospitalised patients fight off the
infection, and failed to reduce death rates or halt progression to
severe disease.
The findings are a setback for a potential therapy that U.S. President
Donald Trump touted in August as a "historic breakthrough", and one
experts say has been used in some 100,000 patients in the United States
already, despite limited evidence on its efficacy.
Scientists not directly involved in the India study, which involved
around 460 patients, said its results were disappointing but should not
mean doctors give up hope altogether on convalescent plasma.
They said further and larger trials are needed, including in COVID-19
patients with milder disease and those newly infected.
"With just a few hundred patients, (the India trial) is still much too
small to give clear results," said Martin Landray, a professor of
medicine and epidemiology at Britain's Oxford University.
"One could well imagine that the treatment might work particularly well
in those earlier in the course of the disease or who have not been able
to mount a good antibody response to the virus of their own," he said.
"But such speculation needs to be tested – we can’t just rely on an
educated guess."
While the United States and India have authorised convalescent plasma
for emergency use, other countries, including Britain, are collecting
donated plasma so that the treatment could be widely rolled out if it is
shown to be effective.
[to top of second column]
|
Convalescent plasma samples in vials are seen before being tested
for COVID-19 antibodies at the Bloodworks Northwest Laboratory
during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak in Renton,
Washington, U.S. September 9, 2020. REUTERS/Lindsey Wasson
The Indian researchers enrolled 464 adults with COVID-19 who were
admitted to hospitals across India between April and July. They were
randomly split into two groups - with one receiving two transfusions
of convalescent plasma alongside best standard care, and the other
getting best standard care only.
After seven days, use of convalescent plasma seemed to improve some
symptoms, such as shortness of breath and fatigue, and led to higher
rates of so-called negative conversion - a sign that the virus is
being neutralised by antibodies.
But this did not translate into a reduction in deaths or progression
to severe disease by 28 days.
Ian Jones, a Reading University professor of virology, agreed with
Landray that plasma may be more likely to work very soon after
someone contracts COVID-19.
He urged these and other researchers to continue to conduct trials,
and to do so in newly diagnosed patients.
"We still do not have enough treatments for the early stage of
disease to prevent severe disease and until this becomes an option,
avoiding being infected with the virus remains the key message," he
said.
(Reporting by Kate Kelland; Editing by Peter Graff and Frances
Kerry)
[© 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2020 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |