Analysis: Take a stance or tiptoe away? Corporate America's battle with
social activism
Send a link to a friend
[October 27, 2020] By
Anna Irrera, Jessica DiNapoli and Imani Moise
(Reuters) - Earlier this year, a flood of
major U.S. companies pledged to address racial inequality and promote
social justice after Minneapolis police killed George Floyd, a Black
man, setting off protests across the country.
Companies that rushed to take a stand include household names like Home
Depot Inc <HD.N>, Procter & Gamble Co <PG.N> and Coca-Cola Co <KO.N>.
Corporate America pledged billions to promote diversity in employee
ranks and the communities in which they operate, including banks like
JPMorgan Chase & Co <JPM.N>, which recently made a $30 billion
commitment over the next five years.
Another set of companies, particularly in Silicon Valley, are turning
more cautious, according to interviews with more than a dozen investors,
entrepreneurs, executive coaches and recruiters.
Companies and employees should avoid taking public stances that stoke
controversy in an increasingly polarized America, proponents of this
view and their advisers told Reuters. Instead, they should focus on
strategic initiatives and meeting financial targets, they said.
Management teams and boards of directors are discussing how to handle
the issue, sources said, with some staying silent as a strategy and
others laying out formalized ground rules detailing how executives can
discuss sensitive social and political issues.
"People are struggling with employees expecting companies to solve
problems that are beyond the purview of the company," said executive
coach Stephen Miles of the Miles Group.
Miles has spoken to at least 10 CEOs in recent weeks who commiserated
with Brian Armstrong, the chief executive of Coinbase, whose Sept. 27
blog post explaining why the cryptocurrency company would remain
apolitical brought the debate into the public square. (Blog: https://bit.ly/2IG9BMm)
Coinbase and its employees should pay attention to the corporate
"mission" and not delve into broader societal problems that distract and
decrease productivity, Armstrong wrote. The company declined to comment
further for this story.
After he shared it on Twitter, some founders and former senior
executives of prominent tech companies replied supportively. The view
may be shared even more widely in corporate America than it appears.
"People aren't taking a public stand about this, but they are asking
about it in the boardroom: 'What should we do?'" said Kathleen Utecht,
managing partner at venture-capital firm Core Innovation Capital.
Utecht agrees with Armstrong. His position is more common than people
may realize, she said, especially at smaller companies where management
teams do not want to devote limited resources to fixing complex societal
issues.
The unprecedented outpour of corporate support for racial justice lately
follows several years of companies taking a stand on other issues that
activists criticize them about, including climate change, the gender
wage gap and LGBTQ rights.
Blue-chip corporations have not wavered from their announcements and
smaller companies have taken a stand, too. On Friday, Expensify CEO
David Barrett emailed the software company's 10 million users urging
them to vote for Democratic presidential contender Joe Biden.
[to top of second column] |
A local resident stands in front of a makeshift memorial honoring
George Floyd, at the spot where he was taken into custody, in
Minneapolis, Minnesota, U.S., June 1, 2020. REUTERS/Carlos Barria
These declarations get attention, partly because of how unusual they are
historically, said Harvard University professor Mike Toffel, who has studied CEO
activism. It is more common now than it was five or 10 years ago, but still
rare, he said, and the feeling that companies should get involved in politics is
far from universal.
"You can count on a couple of hands how many examples you can find," he said.
"Many are not engaging."
Roughly half of the companies in the Russell 1000 did not make statements about
racial inequality last summer, according to preliminary data from As You Sow, a
nonprofit that advocates for corporate accountability.
Of those that did make statements, 195 were in hard-to-find locations like a
CEO's LinkedIn page or staff Facebook page, not the corporate website, said
Andrew Behar, As You Sow's chief executive.
Lloyd Carney, a former tech executive who sits on the boards of companies
including artificial intelligence provider Nuance Communications Inc <NUAN.O>,
said "smart" companies are taking steps to address social causes internally, but
not in a splashy way. That allows them to avoid backlash from employees,
customers or politicians, he said.
"It's one of those things where it's better to make quiet noise," said Carney.
"A press release is the worst thing you can do in this highly politicized
environment."
About half a dozen companies outside Silicon Valley recently set up "guardrails"
for how executives can discuss sensitive social and political issues, like Black
Lives Matter, one adviser to boards told Reuters. Executives must make it clear
that they are speaking in a personal capacity on certain issues and notify
boards about their comments, the adviser said.
For instance, high-tech manufacturer Sono-Tek Corp <SOTK.PK> adopted a similar
code of conduct in September that forbids employees from participating in
politics on the job or with company resources.
The provision is especially important in today's tumultuous world and is meant
to help employees feel comfortable at work, said the company's chief financial
officer, Steve Bagley.
"Large businesses want people to buy their product, to support their company,
whether they are hardcore Democrats or hardcore Republicans, or in between,"
said Ronn Torossian, head of 5W Public Relations, who talks to CEOs across a
wide swath of industries. "A week doesn't pass that major companies aren’t
discussing this."
(Reporting by Anna Irrera in London and Jessica DiNapoli and Imani Moise in New
York; Editing by Lauren Tara LaCapra, Lisa Shumaker and Paritosh Bansal)
[© 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2020 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |