The Rust Belt boom that wasn't: Heartland job growth lagged under Trump
Send a link to a friend
[October 27, 2020]
By Howard Schneider
(Reuters) - The voters of Monroe County,
Michigan, may have expected an economic windfall when they flipped from
supporting Democrat Barack Obama to help put Donald Trump in the White
House in 2016.
But it went the other way: Through the first three years of the Trump
administration the county lost jobs, and brought in slightly less in
wages in the first three months of 2020 than in the first three months
of 2017 as Trump was taking over.
And that was before the pandemic and the associated recession.
With the U.S. election just a week away, recently released government
data and new analysis show just how little progress Trump made in
changing the trajectory of the Rust Belt region that propelled his
improbable rise to the White House.
While job and wage growth continued nationally under Trump, extending
trends that took root under President Obama, the country's economic
weight also continued shifting south and west, according to data from
the U.S. Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages that was recently
updated to include the first three months of 2020.
A recent study from the Economic Innovation Group pointed to the same
conclusion. It found relative stagnation in economic and social
conditions in the Midwest compared with states like Texas or Tennessee
where "superstar" cities such as Dallas and Nashville enjoyed more of
the spoils of a decade-long U.S. expansion.
LAGGING THE COUNTRY
Across the industrial belt from Wisconsin to Pennsylvania, private job
growth from the first three months of 2017 through the first three
months of 2020 lagged the rest of the country - with employment in
Michigan, Wisconsin and Ohio growing 2% or less over that time compared
to a 4.5% national average, according to QCEW data analyzed by Reuters.
Texas and California saw job growth of more than 6% from 2017 through
the start of 2020, by contrast, while Idaho led the nation with
employment growing more than 10%.
Perhaps notably for the election, a Reuters analysis of 17 prominent
counties in the five battleground states of Florida, Michigan, Ohio,
Pennsylvania and Wisconsin showed the limits of Trump's controversial
tax and trade policies in generating jobs where he promised them. All 17
of the counties had a voting age population greater than 100,000 people
as of 2016, supported Obama in the 2012 election, and voted for Trump in
2016.
In 13 of those counties, all in the Rust Belt region, private job growth
lagged the rest of the country. Employment actually shrank in five of
them. Of the four with faster job growth than the rest of the country,
two were in Florida, one was in Pennsylvania and one was in Wisconsin.
The findings show that under the "greatest economy ever" boasts that
Trump made before the pandemic, when job and wage growth were indeed
strong, the fundamental contours of regional U.S. prosperity seemed
largely unchanged.
Some of that may have stemmed from Trump's own policies. The use of
steel tariffs, for example, may have ended up costing Michigan jobs.
"The key battleground areas...have not fared well under President Trump,
even prior to the pandemic," said Moody's Analytics Chief Economist Mark
Zandi. The swing state counties most supportive of Trump in 2016, he
said, were "especially vulnerable" to the president's trade war tactics
because of their ties to global markets.
[to top of second column]
|
A worker wearing a Trump 2020 campaign shirt sits among other
workers listening to U.S. President Donald Trump as the president
speaks at a Whirlpool Corporation washing machine factory in Clyde,
Ohio, U.S., August 6, 2020. REUTERS/Joshua Roberts/File Photo
DRAMATIC SHIFT
But Trump was also swimming against a very strong tide, driven by
forces bigger than a Tweet or a tariff can likely counter. For
decades people, capital and economic output have been shifting from
a mid-20th century concentration in the U.S. Northeast and Midwest
to the open land, cheaper wages and more temperate climate of the
Sun Belt, and the innovation corridor from Silicon Valley to
Washington state.
Trump, in his 2016 campaign, put a premium on manufacturing jobs -
last century's path to the middle class - and as president used a
combination of trade policy, tariffs, and blunt force arm-twisting
on companies to try to shore up the prospects of the industrial
heartland that formed his electoral base.
It didn't happen. Texas, according to QCEW data, gained more
manufacturing jobs from 2017 to the start of 2020 than Ohio,
Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania combined; the smaller but
increasingly competitive manufacturing cluster in Tennessee,
Georgia, South Carolina and Alabama gained as many factory positions
as those legacy manufacturing states.
While Trump may have failed in his efforts to reinvigorate the Rust
Belt, the forces acting against the region pre-date his
administration.
A longer-term analysis by the EIG, looking at outcomes across an
index of social and economic measures, showed little progress from
the start of the century through 2018.
According to a Reuters analysis of EIG data, two to three times as
many counties in Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin slipped further
down the think tank's Distressed Communities Index as climbed to a
more prosperous bracket over those nearly two decades.
In Florida and Washington state, by contrast, five times as many
counties moved into a more well-off bracket, and in California three
times as many counties prospered.
EIG research director Kenan Fikri said it was "easy to forget" that
the Midwest and Great Lakes regions were once the "pinnacle of what
the U.S. had to offer" before the economy shifted to a more tech,
service-oriented and global footing.
"We have seen the gravity of economic wellbeing take a dramatic
shift to the west ... It continued unabated through the first
several years of the Trump administration," he said.
(Reporting by Howard Schneider; Editing by Dan Burns and Andrea
Ricci)
[© 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2020 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |