U.S. cannot shield Trump from rape accuser's defamation lawsuit, judge
rules
Send a link to a friend
[October 28, 2020]
By Jonathan Stempel
NEW YORK (Reuters) - A federal judge on
Tuesday rejected a U.S. government request to drop Donald Trump as a
defendant in a defamation lawsuit by a writer who said the president
falsely denied raping her in a Manhattan department store a quarter
century ago.
U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan in Manhattan refused to let the
government substitute itself for Trump as a defendant in former Elle
magazine columnist E. Jean Carroll's lawsuit.
A ruling for the government would have shielded Trump from liability and
likely doomed Carroll's defamation claim.
Carroll had sued Trump last November in a New York state court, after he
had denied having raped her in Bergdorf Goodman in the mid-1990s or
knowing who she was. Trump said she fabricated the story to sell a new
book, and added: "She's not my type."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0c2dd/0c2dd70bdfd5564d089bf383039c9bbc2b7f7db8" alt=""
Acting at the behest of Attorney General William Barr, the Department of
Justice moved the case to federal court, where it said Trump acted in
his official capacity when denying Carroll's claims, and thus could not
be sued personally for defamation.
But Kaplan said a law shielding federal employees from being sued for
acts done during their employment did not cover presidents. He also said
Trump did not make his statements about Carroll in the scope of his
employment as president.
"No one even arguably directed or controlled President Trump when he
commented on the plaintiff’s accusation, which had nothing to do with
the official business of government, that he raped her decades before he
took office," Kaplan wrote in a 61-page decision. "And no one had the
ability to control him."
The Justice Department declined to comment.
Carroll's lawsuit is one of many legal actions Trump faces as he seeks
reelection on Nov. 3.
He has denied the claims of several women who accused him of sexual
misconduct occurring before he took office.
Roberta Kaplan, a lawyer for Carroll, said they looked forward to
pursuing the defamation case in federal court.
"The simple truth is that President Trump defamed our client because she
was brave enough to reveal that he had sexually assaulted her, and that
brutal, personal attack cannot be attributed to the Office of the
President," she said.
[to top of second column]
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ff3a/3ff3a8540de2de9c84687cc92642f5777db813c9" alt=""
A federal judge on Tuesday rejected a U.S. government request to
drop Donald Trump as a defendant in a defamation lawsuit by a writer
who said the president falsely denied raping her in a Manhattan
department store in the 1990s. This report produced by Jillian
Kitchener.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2ac53/2ac539cb613f46251a726f0600f3e5225f57a6df" alt=""
Carroll said in a statement: "When Donald Trump called me a liar and
denied that he had ever met me, he was not speaking on behalf of the
United States. I am happy that Judge Kaplan recognized these basic
truths."
NO FREEDOM TO DEFAME
The Justice Department moved the lawsuit to federal court after
Justice Verna Saunders of a Manhattan state court had in August
rejected Trump's bid to postpone the case.
She said the U.S. Supreme Court's recent rejection of Trump's claim
of absolute immunity from criminal proceedings while in office
applied to state court proceedings involving his unofficial or
personal conduct.
That ruling could have allowed Carroll's lawyers to seek a DNA
sample from Trump, to match against a dress Carroll said she wore at
Bergdorf Goodman.
The Justice Department's intervention put that process on hold.
But the judge said its arguments went "much too far" by leaving
Trump "free (to) defame anyone who criticizes his conduct or impugns
his character," without consequences for the president and
regardless of the harm to his target.
Kaplan said it would be different if Trump were being challenged in
court over his official conduct.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40f14/40f148e3fb9a9d93027abe0e1b7617b60c860a34" alt=""
"A comment about government action, public policy, or even an
election is categorically different than a comment about an alleged
sexual assault that took place roughly twenty years before the
president took office," he wrote.
(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Additional reporting by
Sarah N. Lynch in Washington, D.C.; Editing by Chizu Nomiyama,
Bernadette Baum and David Gregorio)
[© 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2020 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |