Democrats prefer 'scalpel' over 'jackhammer' to reform key U.S. internet
law
Send a link to a friend
[October 29, 2020] By
Nandita Bose
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Big Tech's decisions
to block some posts and videos while letting other content viewed as
inflammatory proliferate have drawn the ire of Republicans and Democrats
alike, raising the prospect that a 24-year-old U.S. law that fostered
the internet's explosion will be pared back.
While many Republicans call for the repeal of Section 230 of the
Communications Decency Act, Democrats would prefer targeted, surgical
revision of the law protecting Facebook and Twitter from being sued for
content posted by users.
President Donald Trump and top Republicans, angered by what they allege
is tech companies' censorship of conservative ideas, say the legal
shield has outlived its usefulness. That thinking was on full display at
a hearing held to discuss the law on Wednesday.
Democrats have also taken aim at the law because they claim it fails to
tackle widespread misinformation and hate. But they argue the law is
important to free speech online and want a more deliberate and moderate
approach to reform.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c105e/c105e1c2a85c926861f0f322c72ca0a8903241d9" alt=""
Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden has called for "revoking" the
law, but many believe he will be more receptive to ideas from
congressional Democrats if he wins the election.
Multiple Democratic lawmakers said in interviews that they oppose repeal
of Section 230, which allows companies to take down or leave material on
their platforms without the risk of facing lawsuits.
"Repealing it outright is not viable," Representative Anna Eshoo, a
Democrat from California said. She has introduced legislation to remove
tech companies' liability protections if their algorithms amplify
harmful, radicalizing content that leads to offline violence. She
advocated using "a scalpel instead of a jackhammer to reform the
critical statute."
The approach has also found support from Virginia's Democratic Senator
Joe Manchin, according to a staffer. Manchin's bill, which is
co-sponsored by Republican John Cornyn, aims to stop the sale of opioids
and illicit drugs online by amending 230 protections. It requires
companies to report suspicious activity to law enforcement or be held
liable for that failure.
An aide to Senator Ron Wyden, a Democrat from Oregon who originally
co-authored Section 230, said the senator urges caution on steps that
could limit free speech online. "He isn't saying no one can ever change
a word of Section 230, but that politicians need to be very careful when
it comes to tinkering with foundational laws around speech and the
internet," the aide said.
[to top of second column] |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f11c8/f11c882eb914c31d31560899f793b4633e180c4b" alt=""
Facebook, Google and Twitter logos are seen in this combination
photo from Reuters files. REUTERS
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05d46/05d466a69645a438dd881e564cd764252b71488d" alt=""
Meanwhile tech trade groups over the past year began an aggressive lobbying
effort against changing the law and view calls for repeal as draconian.
"I do expect the more extreme statements on wanting a full repeal to die down...
the Democrats are walking that kind of rhetoric back," said Carl Szabo, general
counsel for Netchoice - a trade group that counts Google, Facebook and Twitter
among its members.
A MODERATE APPROACH
There is an array of proposals on Capitol Hill. Most of the bills that have
found Democratic sponsors seek to change protections for harmful conduct on
online platforms like crime, rather than on user speech.
Legislation from Senator Richard Blumenthal, a Democrat, and Republican Senator
Lindsey Graham goes after online child pornography. Companies that do not detect
such images would lose their 230 immunity. The legislation, however, has been
criticized by civil rights groups as infringing privacy of ordinary users.
https://reut.rs/3munhZA
Democratic Senator Brian Schatz and Senate No. 2 Republican John Thune propose
another bill that would require platforms to explain their content screening
practices in everyday language, notify users of content rejection within 14 days
and allow appeals.
Matt Perault, director at the Duke University's Center for Science and
Technology Policy, said the U.S. election has given momentum to calls for
revoking Section 230, which would radically alter the nature of online
expression.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f6f4/4f6f48bc90ec0d6e8521749f7f6f4688d04d5ef3" alt=""
"No matter the outcome of the election, I think Section 230 reform will be on
the agenda next Congress," Representative Eshoo said.
(Reporting by Nandita Bose in Washington; Editing by Chris Sanders and Cynthia
Osterman)
[© 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2020 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |