Analysis: Biden presidency for Turkey would mean tougher U.S. stance but
chance to repair ties
Send a link to a friend
[October 29, 2020]
By Humeyra Pamuk
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Days after Turkey
took delivery of Russian missile defense systems in July 2019, top
security officials in the Trump administration were in full agreement
that Washington should deliver on its threat to impose sanctions on its
NATO ally.
The U.S. State Department had sent its recommendations to the National
Security Council calling for prompt sanctions on Turkish individuals and
entities and the measures were going to be rolled out once President
Donald Trump approved.
He never did, disagreeing with his closest advisers, two sources
familiar with Trump's decision-making said. To date, he has refused to
impose sanctions on Ankara for buying the Russian S-400 missiles, which
Washington says compromise NATO defenses.
While overruling advisers is common in Trump's policy playbook, his
instinct to go lightly on Turkey has prevented severely fractured ties
between Ankara and Washington from total collapse.
The decades-old partnership between the NATO allies has gone through
unprecedented tumult in the past five years over disagreements on Syria
policy, Ankara's closer ties with Moscow, its naval ambitions in the
eastern Mediterranean, U.S. charges against a state-owned Turkish bank
and erosion of rights and freedoms in Turkey.
Should Republican Trump's Democratic rival Joe Biden win Tuesday's
election, as opinion polls suggest, Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan
will be losing his most valuable ally in Washington, leaving Ankara
vulnerable to the wrath of a deeply antagonized U.S. Congress and some
U.S. agencies skeptical of Turkey.
Biden, who called Erdogan an 'autocrat' last December, is expected to be
tougher on Turkey, particularly over its weakening of human rights and
democratic norms, and could impose sanctions over Ankara's purchase of
the Russian S-400s after Erdogan last week confirmed testing was
underway.
Still, Biden's priority to counter Russia and Iran and reinvest in
multilateral alliances could play into Ankara's hands, analysts said.
"Biden is unlikely to lurch into a reflexively punitive approach, as
many seem to assume, but he will likely close the gap between the
professional ranks of the U.S. government bureaucracy and the White
House that has yawned wide under Trump," said Max Hoffman, associate
director at the Center for American Progress.
"That means Erdogan will not be able to upend U.S. policy with one call
to the White House," he said.
Trump has publicly praised Erdogan and his combative ruling style,
calling him "a friend" and "hell of a leader." Washington has largely
stayed quiet in the face of an increasingly authoritarian Erdogan.
"I think it's fair to say you would see stronger pushback (from a Biden
administration) against the Turkish government where it does run counter
to U.S. interests," Torrey Taussig, research director at Harvard Kennedy
School's Belfer Center said, while noting that Turkey's democratic
backsliding would likely be a more primary concern.
Biden campaign officials declined to comment for this story.
[to top of second column]
|
U.S. Vice President Joe Biden (L) attends a bilateral meeting with
Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan in Washington March 31, 2016.
REUTERS/Joshua Roberts/File Photo
CONGRESS 'OUT OF PATIENCE'
One of Biden's first foreign policy moves would be to restore
Washington's commitment to alliances, first and foremost to NATO,
whose cohesion has been damaged under Trump as he questioned the
relevance of the 70-year-old organization.
To repair the transatlantic alliance, analysts said, Biden will have
to work with Turkey, or at least try.
"I expect Biden will reach out to Erdogan because the priority is
going to be to resuscitate NATO and you know you can't do that
without Turkey," said Soner Cagaptay, senior fellow at the
Washington Institute for Near East Policy.
But that effort will clash with mounting pressure from the U.S.
Congress to impose Countering America’s Adversaries Through
Sanctions Act (CAATSA), legislation that passed 98-2 in the U.S.
Senate, designed to punish aggression by Russia, Iran and North
Korea and deter others from cooperating with them.
"Congress has already run out of patience," Democratic Senator Chris
Van Hollen said in an interview. "I think you will find bipartisan
support in Congress to push the administration, regardless of which
administration, to follow through on the CAATSA sanctions."
Washington's punishment to Ankara's Russian missile purchase so far
has been expelling Turkey from the F-35 fighter jet program. But
Turkish companies still produce components of the jets.
Ankara and Washington have a window of six to nine months to reset
ties and build goodwill, Emre Peker, director at Eurasia Group,
wrote in a recent research note, with "risk of accidents" remaining
high and increasing over time.
"Given the options to punish Turkey, and short of Ankara renouncing
its S-400s, Biden will likely start to impose toward end-2021 less
onerous measures under CAATSA and threaten more severe action unless
Turkey reverses course. CAATSA could be catastrophic for Turkey,"
Peker wrote.
Turkey's beleaguered lira is particularly vulnerable to U.S.
sanctions.
For now, Ankara gives no indications of walking back.
The tests "have been and are being conducted," Erdogan said on
Friday, adding in what sounded like a challenge to America:
"Whatever your sanctions are, don't hold back."
(Additional reporting by Trevor Hunnicutt and Jonathan Spicer,;
Reporting and Writing by Humeyra Pamuk; Editing by Mary Milliken and
Grant McCool)
[© 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2020 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|