U.S. judge sets May trial date for Bannon, co-defendants on border wall
fraud charges
Send a link to a friend
[September 01, 2020]
By Brendan Pierson and Karen Freifeld
NEW YORK (Reuters) - A U.S. judge on Monday
set a May 2021 trial date for Steve Bannon, a former adviser to Donald
Trump, and three co-defendants on charges of defrauding donors in a
scheme to build the president's signature wall along the U.S.-Mexico
border.
Federal prosecutors on Aug. 20 accused Bannon, U.S. Air Force veteran
Brian Kolfage and two others of orchestrating a scheme to defraud
hundreds of thousands of dollars in connection with a $25 million
crowdfunding campaign called "We Build the Wall."
Bannon and Kolfage used hundreds of thousands of dollars of that money
to cover personal expenses, according to the charges.
Kolfage, Andrew Badolato, and Timothy Shea all pleaded not guilty at a
virtual hearing on Monday. They were granted bail and will surrender
their passports. Bannon, 66, pleaded not guilty earlier this month.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6017/c60171409af8c2402d287429087f8e4b43ee7ab5" alt=""
U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres in Manhattan set May 24, 2021 as the
trial date for the case.
During the virtual hearing, the judge noted that only a few courtrooms
in the building were outfitted to handle technical challenges posed by
the novel coronavirus pandemic.
"I'm going to be optimistic and hope that we have courtrooms available,"
she said.
Kolfage lost both legs and his right hand in a 2004 rocket attack in
Iraq.
Bannon, as a top adviser to Trump's presidential campaign and later
White House chief strategist, helped articulate the "America First"
right-wing populism and fierce opposition to immigration that have been
hallmarks of Trump's 3-1/2 years in office.
Torres cautioned the defendants and their lawyers against making public
statements that could taint the impartiality of jurors or the fairness
of the trial, and said she may issue a "special order" restricting their
activities. All four defendants told Torres they understood.
[to top of second column]
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8279d/8279d8d2698906165802a07df15d1af170109b31" alt=""
Former White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon exits the Manhattan
Federal Court, following his arraignment hearing for conspiracy to
commit wire fraud and conspiracy to commit money laundering, in the
Manhattan borough of New York City, New York, U.S. August 20, 2020.
REUTERS/Andrew Kelly/File Photo
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15436/15436e49e74ca848342d54c95c91bf4cbc3daf28" alt=""
In a court filing last week, prosecutors asked the judge to warn
Kolfage and the other defendants against making "extrajudicial
statements" that could taint the jury pool, citing what they called
a "steady stream" of often "highly inflammatory posts" by Kolfage on
social media.
These included descriptions of the case as a "witch hunt" and a
political effort targeting Trump supporters and donors to "We Build
the Wall." according to the filing.
Harvey Steinberg, a lawyer for Kolfage, accused the government of
itself being out of line by publicly discussing his client's case
out of court after charges were announced. A prosecutor told Torres
there wasn't anything unusual in the government's public discussion
of the case.
Trump has said he felt "very badly" about the charges against Bannon,
whom he fired from his White House post in 2017, but added that he
had not dealt with his former adviser for "literally years."
(Reporting By Brendan Pierson and Karen Freifeld in New York;
Additional reporting by Jonathan Stempel; Editing by Noeleen Walder
and Grant McCool)
[© 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2020 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ee4d/9ee4dd7514872758cb39a10c82cc4bfebddeaa14" alt="" |