U.S. President Donald Trump has repeatedly said a vaccine is
possible before the Nov. 3 election, and accused a “deep state”
within the nation’s top health regulator of trying to slow pivotal
clinical trials to hamper his chances at a second term.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration refuted that claim, saying its
decisions will be guided by data alone. Drugmakers, seeking to
bolster public confidence amid political squabbles on Tuesday
pledged to uphold scientific safety and efficacy standards in their
quest for a vaccine.
However, comments from companies suggest they could have an answer
on whether their vaccines work within that time frame.
"It would really be an amazing vaccine to show that," Dr. Anthony
Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious
Diseases, told Reuters.
![](http://archives.lincolndailynews.com/2020/Sep/09/images/ads/current/LPL_small%201.gif)
Fauci said initial trial results are likely to become available in
November or December, but late October remains a possibility. "It is
conceivable that if there are enough infections documented early on
that you might get that answer earlier," he said.
Vaccines must demonstrate they are at least 50% more effective than
a placebo to be considered for approval. To prove that, government
officials have said, at least 150 COVID-19 infections must be
recorded among trial participants with at least twice as many
occurring among the placebo group.
If a vaccine is especially effective, companies could have their
answer sooner. Pfizer Inc and Moderna Inc, whose U.S. vaccine trials
have enrolled thousands of people and are the most advanced, say
they may have proof after just a few dozen subjects become infected.
Independent panels of experts called data and safety monitoring
boards (DSMB) will review trial data at pre-specified points. These
boards can recommend companies stop the trials if the evidence is
overwhelmingly positive or negative.
For Pfizer, the first interim look occurs when 32 trial volunteers
get infected.
Experts interviewed by Reuters cautioned that information gleaned
from a limited number of subjects could miss important safety issues
that letting the trial fully play out might reveal.
'ABSOLUTELY INSUFFICIENT'
Pfizer's trial calls for four interim analyses by the DSMB, the
first after just 32 recorded infections. "We may have enough data to
be able to share the first analysis by October," said Pfizer
spokeswoman Jerica Pitts.
Moderna’s first interim analysis will come after 53 trial subjects
become infected, the company told investors last month.
[to top of second column] |
![](http://archives.lincolndailynews.com/2020/Sep/09/images/ads/current/graue_20ENVISION_090820.png)
Basing a decision on 53 cases, is “an absolutely insufficient number,” said Dr.
Gregory Poland, a vaccine researcher at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester who has
served on FDA vaccine advisory panels. "You would know very little about
safety."
To halt the trials due to positive results, vaccines would likely have to exceed
the 50% efficacy threshold.
Pfizer has not disclosed what standard will be used for stopping its trial
early. William Gruber, head of vaccine clinical research and development for
Pfizer, said "the standard would be evidence of very high efficacy."
A senior official with the U.S. effort to accelerate COVID-19 vaccine
development said companies have created appropriate trials to hold interim
analyses that could detect especially effective vaccines earlier.
SPEEDY ENROLLMENT
Although both drugmakers began vaccinating people in their respective
30,000-subject trials on July 28, Pfizer is in position to generate results
earlier in part because it is administering the second shot of its two-dose
vaccine a week earlier than Moderna. Moderna also slowed enrollment to ensure
greater participation of at-risk minorities in its study.
Pfizer's trial also begins collecting data on infections that occur a week after
it administers its second shot. Moderna has a two-week lag between the second
shot and when it will begin collecting infection data in earnest.
Both trials are on pace to be fully enrolled soon.
Dr. Henry Miller, a senior fellow at the Pacific Research Institute think tank
and former director of the FDA's office of biotechnology, said an emergency use
authorization based on a small number of infections would not deliver an
adequate answer on the safety of a vaccine intended for use by millions of
healthy people. Some side effects could take four to six months to occur, he
said.
![](http://archives.lincolndailynews.com/2016/Aug/26/images/ads/current/directory_buttons.png)
Dr. Gregory Glenn, research chief for Novavax Inc, which is also developing a
coronavirus vaccine, said the October timeline remains possible. But he believes
Americans will likely be waiting longer.
"I just think humility is a good thing right now," he said. "The FDA set out
some pretty strict criteria for success. So that's going to take a pretty good
vaccine to do that."
(Reporting by Michael Erman and Julie Steenhuysen; Editing by Caroline Humer and
Bill Berkrot)
[© 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2020 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |