The
Luxembourg-based General Court in July scrapped the Commission's
2016 ruling, saying that EU competition enforcers had not met
the requisite legal standard to show that Apple had enjoyed an
unfair advantage.
Vestager said the case was important, a sign that her drive to
get multinationals pay their fair share of taxes would continue
unabated.
"The General Court judgment raises important legal issues that
are of relevance to the Commission in its application of State
aid rules to tax planning cases," she said in a statement.
"The Commission also respectfully considers that in its judgment
the General Court has made a number of errors of law," Vestager
said.
She said legislation is required to close the tax loopholes and
ensure transparency, in a call to EU countries to revamp rules.
Apple said the court judgment proved it has always complied with
Irish laws and that the issue was more about where it should pay
taxes rather than the amount.
Irish Finance Minister Paschal Donohoe said Ireland has always
been clear that the correct amount of Irish tax was paid and
that the country provided no state aid to Apple.
The Commission's case centred on two Irish tax rulings that it
said artificially reduced Apple's tax burden for over two
decades, which in 2014 was as low as 0.005%.
Vestager has three ongoing tax cases, Ikea's and Nike's deals
with the Netherlands, as well as Huhtamaki's agreement with
Luxembourg.
($1 = 0.8587 euros)
(Reporting by Foo Yun Chee; editing by Barbara Lewis)
[© 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2020 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|
|