Biden's pick for top U.S. civil rights lawyer, Kristen Clarke, faces
fraught task
Send a link to a friend
[April 13, 2021]
By Sarah N. Lynch
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Joe
Biden's nominee to lead the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division,
Kristen Clarke, is poised to take on the role at a fraught time in
American history.
Clarke will face a Senate hearing this week as hate crimes against Asian
Americans are on the rise, Republican-led state legislatures are
advancing bills that voting-rights groups say would disenfranchise Black
voters and former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin is on trial
facing a charge of murdering a Black man, George Floyd.
Clarke will appear before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday
alongside Todd Kim, Biden's nominee to lead the department's
Environmental and Natural Resources Division.
Kim, like Clarke, previously worked in the Justice Department division
he is now nominated to lead. Most recently, he served as a deputy
counsel in the U.S. Department of Energy.
Former colleagues say Clarke's experience, both as a Justice Department
lawyer and as executive director of a large civil rights organization,
make her qualified to tackle the challenge.
"If you were inventing a nominee from scratch... you'd come up with
Kristen or someone very, very close," said Justin Levitt, a former
colleague who teaches law at Loyola Law School.
Clarke has spent a good chunk of her career advocating for voting rights
issues.
Ernest Montgomery, a councilman in Calera, Alabama, said he was
impressed by Clarke when he met her in 2010.
Montgomery was an intervener in Shelby County v. Holder, a 2010 voting
rights case arising from a dispute over whether states and counties must
seek preclearance, or approval, from the federal government before
re-drawing voting districts. He got involved as a third-party advocate
in the litigation after the city re-drew his district's lines, diluting
the Black vote.
Clarke, then an attorney with the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, represented
him, arguing in support of requiring federal preclearance of
redistricting as a crucial constitutional protection to root out
discrimination against minority voters.
"She did a superb job," Montgomery said.
[to top of second column]
|
Kristen Clarke, U.S. President-elect Joe Biden's nominee to be
assistant attorney general for the civil rights division, speaks as
Biden announces his Justice Department nominees at his transition
headquarters in Wilmington, Delaware, U.S., January 7, 2021.
REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque
The lower courts sided with Clarke's view on preclearance, but in
2013 the Supreme Court reversed and gutted a core part of the 1965
Voting Rights Act in a move civil rights lawyers say made it easier
to discriminate against voters of color.
Since 2016, Clarke has led the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights
Under Law. The most intense time in that job arguably occurred
around the 2020 presidential election, when former President Donald
Trump refused to concede to Biden and made baseless claims of voter
fraud.
"It was non-stop," Clarke's colleague with the Lawyer's Committee,
Jon Greenbaum, said of the group's voting rights work in 2020. "It
was high stakes."
Clarke's nomination is expected to dominate much of Wednesday's
confirmation hearing, with some Republicans poised to pounce after
conservative media launched a series of attacks on her dating back
to her days as a student at Harvard University.
One has centered on comments in her college paper intended as parody
about Black people having "greater mental, physical and spiritual
abilities" in an effort to counter the controversial 1994 book "The
Bell Curve," which made arguments linking race and intelligence.
Another group claimed without evidence that Clarke is anti-Semitic
based on a speaker she invited to a college campus event decades
ago, and that she "believes single black mothers raise criminals."
Clarke is a divorced, single Black mother, and her comments were
about the challenges Black families face when trying to raise
children without a father figure.
Attorney General Merrick Garland, in his confirmation hearing in
February, sought to beat back some of the criticism.
"I do not believe that she is anti-Semitic," said Garland, who is
Jewish. "I do not believe she is discriminatory in any sense."
(Reporting by Sarah N. Lynch; Editing by Scott Malone and Dan
Grebler)
[© 2021 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2021 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |