Analysis: U.S. banks' bond bonanza driven by extraordinary market
conditions, regulatory decisions
Send a link to a friend
[April 21, 2021] By
Pete Schroeder
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Record-breaking Wall
Street bank bond offerings in recent days are being driven by a
combination of extraordinary market conditions and regulatory decisions
that can be traced to the government's pandemic relief efforts, said
analysts.
JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley have
or are planning to issue a total of $40 billion in debt, according to
media reports. JPMorgan's $13 billion April 15 bond sale was briefly an
industry record until it was topped the next day by Bank of America's
$15 billion offering.
While the banks did not provide details on why they are raising the
debt, analysts said a confluence of monetary and regulatory factors are
driving the unprecedented cash grab, underscoring the increasingly
tricky balancing act for Wall Street lenders as the economy emerges from
the pandemic slump.
That economic rebound driven by the vaccination roll-out and trillions
of dollars of stimulus, combined with ultra-low interest rates, has made
for excellent borrowing conditions on the heels of stellar first-quarter
earnings.
After the U.S. Federal Reserve said in March that it would lift capital
distribution curbs on banks that pass its June stress tests, many also
want to have enough cash on hand to keep shareholders happy with
increased stock buy backs.
"We are going to buy back a substantial amount ... as soon as we can,"
Bank of America Chief Executive Brian Moynihan told analysts during the
bank's earnings call prior to the bond sale.
GROWING DEPOSITS
But it's not all good news. While the fire-hose of government stimulus
gushing through the economy flattered bank earnings, it has also reduced
loan growth and caused deposits to surge. In turn, banks have had to
park those deposits with the Federal Reserve and in safe-haven assets
such as U.S. Treasuries.
"These deposits are growing like crazy, but loans are not and common
equity is not, and that creates a serious problem for the banks," said
Dick Bove, an analyst with Odeon Capital Group.
"I've never seen this happen before."
[to top of second column] |
Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell testifies before a House
Financial Services Committee hearing on "Oversight of the Treasury
Department's and Federal Reserve's Pandemic Response" in the Rayburn
House Office Building in Washington, U.S., December 2, 2020. Jim Lo
Scalzo/Pool via REUTERS
For some banks, those problems are regulatory. As of April 1, banks had to
resume holding extra capital against Treasuries and Fed deposits after the
central bank ended temporary pandemic relief that had allowed lenders to exclude
those assets from a key capital calculation.
That "supplementary leverage ratio" (SLR) is an extra safeguard introduced
following the decade-ago financial crisis that requires big banks to hold cash
against assets regardless of their risk. With surging deposits, some banks may
be looking to raise debt to ensure they operate comfortably within the ratio.
"It's quite likely that the debt issuance may have been partly driven by the
expiration of the SLR relief," said Gennadiy Goldberg, senior rates strategist
with TD Securities.
Bank of America executives said on its first quarter earnings call prior to the
bond sale that it still had room before it hit its leverage ratio threshold. The
bond sale was primarily aimed at the bank's business growth, including share
repurchases and resolution planning, according to a person familiar with the
matter.
Morgan Stanley's debt offering was not driven by regulatory constraints,
according to a person familiar with the matter. A spokesman for Goldman Sachs
did not respond to a request for comment. The Fed declined to comment.
JPMorgan, for its part, issued the bonds in part to address regulatory
constraints, according to one person familiar with the matter. On its earnings
call, the bank's executives flagged that deposit growth had increased its
leverage, prompting Chief Financial Officer Jennifer Piepszak to criticize the
rules.
"Raising capital against deposits and/or turning away deposits are unnatural
actions for banks, and cannot be good for the system in the long run."
(Reporting by Pete Schroeder; additional reporting by Megan Davies; editing by
Michelle Price and Nick Zieminski)
[© 2021 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2021 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |