Hong Kong passes immigration bill, raising alarm over 'exit bans'
Send a link to a friend
[April 28, 2021]
By Pak Yiu
HONG KONG (Reuters) -Hong Kong's
legislature passed on Wednesday a controversial immigration bill, which
lawyers, diplomats and right groups fear will give authorities unlimited
powers to prevent residents and others from entering or leaving the
Chinese-ruled city.
The government has dismissed those fears as "complete nonsense," saying
the legislation, which will come into effect on Aug. 1, merely aims to
screen illegal immigrants at source amid a backlog of asylum
applications and does not affect constitutional rights of free movement.
"We are facing increasing challenges, especially preventing the number
of illegal immigrants from rising and claimants from abusing the
system," Security Secretary John Lee said, adding that travel rights
remain guaranteed and that the government will introduce subsidiary
legislation in the near term.
The assurances, however, come in a climate of mistrust after the
increasingly authoritarian path officials have taken the imposition of a
sweeping national security law by Beijing last year.
"What is concerning is that in hastily pushing this bill forward, the
government has chosen to ignore civil society groups that have flagged
legitimate concerns," said Michael Vidler, a lawyer with Vidler & Co
Solicitors.
Lawyers say the new law will empower authorities to bar anyone, without
a court order, from entering or leaving Hong Kong - essentially opening
the door for mainland China-style exit bans - and fails to prevent
indefinite detention for refugees.
The Hong Kong Bar Association (HKBA) said in February the bill failed to
explain why such powers were necessary, how they would be used and
provided no limit on the duration of any travel ban, nor any safeguards
against abuse.
The Security Bureau said the law would be applied only to inbound
flights and target illegal immigrants, expressing disappointment at the
"unnecessary misunderstanding" caused by HKBA.
Still, lawyers, diplomats, trade unions and business bodies were puzzled
by the government's reluctance to add the stated limitations into the
bill.
A group of U.S. senators last year estimated at least two dozen U.S.
citizens had been prevented from leaving China in recent years and face
regular surveillance and harassment by authorities. China denies foreign
nationals are under threat of arbitrary detention or exit bans.
[to top of second column]
|
A general view of the Legislative Council meeting debating a
Beijing-backed electoral reform in Hong Kong, China, June 18, 2015.
REUTERS/Bobby Yip
REFUGEE RIGHTS
Activists also say the new legislation raises concerns about
refugees' rights and well-being. It allows immigration officers to
carry guns and, in some cases, requires asylum seekers to
communicate in a language other than their mother tongue.
The government says there are currently 13,000 refugee claimants in
Hong Kong and that it wants to tackle the backlog.
Pro-Beijing lawmaker Elizabeth Quat told the legislature the number
of refugees was "a threat to peace and stability" and the city
needed to heal this "cancer."
The screening process can take years and the claimants' success rate
is 1%. During that period, it is illegal for asylum seekers to work
or volunteer, and they live in limbo, on food vouchers.
Currently, asylum seekers can be detained only if they break the law
or for deportation, for a "reasonable" period.
The bill adds that authorities can also detain a refugee if "the
person poses, or is likely to pose, a threat or security risk to the
community" and does not state what constitutes such a risk. Rights
groups say it broadens the scope for indefinite detention.
David, 25, was granted asylum after arriving from an east African
country four years ago. He said he was detained for 92 days while
being processed and the new bill could lead to an even worse
experience for new claimants.
"It's pretty terrifying, being there without knowing ... how long
you're gong to be there for," said David, who asked Reuters not to
use his full name due to the sensitivity of the matter.
(Writing by Marius Zaharia; Editing by Lincoln Feast & Simon
Cameron-Moore)
[© 2021 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2021 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |