Germany must tighten climate law to protect young people's future, court
rules
Send a link to a friend
[April 29, 2021]
By Thomas Escritt
BERLIN (Reuters) -Germany must update its
climate law by the end of next year to set out how it will bring carbon
emissions down nearly to zero by 2050, its top court ruled on Thursday,
siding with a young woman who argued rising sea levels would engulf her
family farm.
The court concluded that a law passed in 2019 had failed to make
sufficient provision for cuts beyond 2030, casting a shadow over a
signature achievement of Chancellor Angela Merkel's final term in
office.
"The challenged provisions do violate the freedoms of the complainants,
some of whom are still very young," the court said in a statement. "The
provisions irreversibly offload major emission reduction burdens onto
periods after 2030."
Among the plaintiffs was Sophie Backsen
https://www.reuters.com/article/climate-change-germany-lawsuit/german-court-to-rule-on-farmers-climate-change-challenge-idINL8N27G3EK,
22, daughter of a farming family on the North Sea island of Pellworm,
who fears that rising sea levels would engulf her low-lying island,
leaving her with no inheritance.
"We are super happy with the court's decision," she told a news
conference. "Effective climate protection has to be implemented now and
not in 10 years' time, when it'll be too late."
The law commits Germany to ensuring that by 2030 carbon dioxide
emissions should be at least 55% lower than in 1990, and that almost no
carbon dioxide be emitted by 2050.
The challenge was backed by environmental groups including Greenpeace
and the Fridays for Future movement inspired by Swedish activist Greta
Thunberg.
"The court has handed down a major and significant ruling," said Economy
Minister Peter Altmaier in a tweet. "It is epoch-making for climate
protection and the rights of young people. And it creates certainty for
the economy."
[to top of second column]
|
German Chancellor Angela Merkel attends the weekly cabinet meeting
of the German government at the chancellery in Berlin, Germany,
April 27, 2021. Markus Schreiber/Pool via REUTERS
The ruling was stark in the obligations it imposed on
the government, said Roda Verheyen, a lawyer for the plaintiffs.
"The court focuses on the civil liberties of future generations,
saying those rights are being infringed already today," she said.
"This isn't vague, but a very clear decision about fundamental
rights."
The ruling could also have political repercussions ahead of an
election in September that will chose a successor to Merkel, who has
said she will step down.
Finance Minister Olaf Scholz, the Social Democrat candidate to
succeed Merkel, now serving in a "grand coalition" government led by
Merkel's conservatives, said the ruling had only been necessary
because of conservative foot-dragging.
"Dear Colleague," he tweeted in response to Altmaier. "As I remember
it was you and your party that prevented in the first place what the
Constitutional Court is now demanding. But we can fix that. Are you
with us?"
In 2019, the Dutch supreme court also imposed tougher climate
change regulation on its government, saying it had done too little
to protect the low-lying country's citizens from threats to their
"lives and wellbeing."
(Reporting by Thomas EscrittEditing by Kirsti Knolle, Emma Thomasson
and Peter Graff)
[© 2021 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2021 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |