Pennsylvania is a microcosm of such alarming housing trends,
especially east of the Susquehanna River, which is seeing an influx of metro New
Yorkers relocating to the area.
From the Keystone State’s middle-class suburbs to its post-industrial locales,
the housing crisis is a major challenge. In the midstate, most notably in
Harrisburg and Lancaster, housing has become significantly more expensive. In
the northeast’s anthracite coal region, anchored by Scranton, rents are spiking.
And in suburban Philadelphia’s Lansdale, a townhouse went for nearly $500,000.
The Lehigh Valley, a populous metro region once synonymous with
the steel industry, is particularly illustrative. In the
Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton metro area, over half of all new apartments lease at
$1,000 or more per month – a princely sum in the area, which in recent years has
experienced dramatic growth.
As it stands, one-third of households in the Lehigh Valley spend over 30% of
income a month on rent or mortgages, with the highest concentration of
cost-burdened households in the region’s three core cities. This trend is partly
a function of poverty or unemployment, especially following the pandemic, but
it’s also driven by soaring costs and limited supply. The crisis of
affordability threatens to put eventual homeownership – or even an affordable
rental – out of reach.
Unlike the housing crisis in the Bay Area or metro Washington, D.C., the one in
the Lehigh Valley isn’t the result of an adjacent overheated housing market – in
this case, Greater Philadelphia. Instead, the Lehigh Valley itself is
experiencing dramatic economic growth, particularly in its relatively low-paying
warehousing sector. At the same time, the Valley – traditionally a mix of dense
cities, sprawling suburbs, and agricultural surroundings – has increasingly
become an extension of New York City’s exurbs. This trend preceded the pandemic,
but now more and more remote or hybrid workers are fleeing New York and New
Jersey. In short, the Valley faces a perfect storm: growth in local – but often
mediocre-paying – jobs, soaring demand from comparatively affluent New York
expatriates, and regulatory policies that slow new housing construction.
Consider the case of one Lehigh Valley couple recently profiled in the Wall
Street Journal. After 19 rejected offers, the working-class couple bid above the
asking price on a Bethlehem house listed at $250,000. Don’t be fooled by these
prices, which look like bargains in metro Washington or New York; they’re
uncharted territory for the Lehigh Valley, historically less affluent and more
working-class than America’s higher profile, housing-crunched locales.
[to top of second column] |
This raises the question of supply. “The numbers
all come down to inventory, with the Lehigh Valley short in both
for-sale and rental housing stock,” noted LehighValleyLive. As the
Morning Call reported, “Since 2014, projects encompassing 887
apartment units have gone through Bethlehem’s approval process, but
none is considered affordable housing…Some of those units have yet
to be constructed.” This amounts to about 125 new units per year in
a growing city – not nearly enough. At this point, many prospective
homeowners are giving up. Inventory – the number of
units currently for sale – is distinct from supply; but inventory is
a function of supply. A focus on supply often draws criticism from
progressive housing advocates and those who oppose new housing
alike. But its importance is supported by scholarship on new
construction.
In short, Pennsylvania’s affordability crisis isn’t the result of
young families trying to live in neighborhoods they can’t afford. In
the supermarket, you can buy the budget product if you can’t afford
the premium product. In our broken housing market, there’s often no
other option. That’s increasingly the case in regions like the
Lehigh Valley. The state’s housing crisis will require policy
solutions, such as zoning reforms that increase affordability and
density, or housing tax credits.
Housing
affordability is a straightforward economic issue. In a growing
region, there’s an increasing demand for labor. Jobs require people,
and people need housing. Outsourcing housing onto other, more
distant communities forces long commutes on workers and traffic on
everyone else. In the name of preserving neighborhoods, it upends
the economics of those neighborhoods, which once allowed families to
own a home and live near their work. Pennsylvania should draw cautionary lessons from states like
Virginia, where sprawling development – along with the attendant
traffic jams and interstate-widening projects – occurs up to 70
miles from the major employer base of Washington, D.C. and its
suburbs. Pennsylvania, with its surfeit of pleasant, cohesive, and
deeply settled places, can choose a different fate.
Addison Del Mastro writes on urbanism and cultural
history. He writes daily at Substack. Follow him on Twitter @ad_mastro. |