U.S. to outfit border agents with body cameras in major oversight move
Send a link to a friend
[August 04, 2021]
By Ted Hesson
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States
will require thousands of border agents to wear body cameras, according
to two officials and government documents, a major operational change
that could increase oversight of agents and also help capture criminal
activity.
The cameras are expected to be rolled out in parts of Texas and New
Mexico during the summer and expanded to Arizona, California, Vermont
and Texas' busy Rio Grande Valley in the fall and winter, according to a
recent government assessment of how the devices could impact privacy.
Pro-immigrant activists will likely welcome the increased oversight of
an agency some have criticized for excessive use of force and
institutional racism. But a union for border patrol agents also supports
cameras, saying they could assist criminal investigations and help show
that agents act professionally.
The American Civil Liberties Union and other groups have called on
border patrol to use the cameras to improve accountability in the wake
of several high-profile fatal shootings by law enforcement over the past
decade.
Brandon Judd, president of the National Border Patrol Council, stressed
that agents should have access to the footage, including when an agent
is accused of wrongdoing.
"There's no way to erase the footage, there's no way to doctor the
footage, so there's no reason the agents shouldn't have access," he said
in an interview.
Border Patrol's parent agency, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP),
is the largest law enforcement agency in the United States, which
presents a unique challenge for video footage collection and storage.
Recordings of illegal activity, use of force or agent misconduct could
be used as evidence in investigations or prosecutions, the privacy
assessment said.
The cameras could offer new insight into the policing of the southern
border, where migrant arrests have risen to 20-year highs in recent
months and encounters sometimes take place in remote areas.
In cases where footage could be used as evidence in a criminal case, it
could be retained for up to 75 years, according to the privacy
assessment. Footage that does not have value as evidence would be
destroyed within 180 days.
[to top of second column]
|
An armed U.S. Customs and Border Patrol agent stands watch at the
border fence next to the beach in Tijuana, at the Border State Park
in San Diego, California, U.S. November 16, 2018. REUTERS/Mike
Blake/File Photo
After a bipartisan group of lawmakers spearheaded
efforts to secure funding for bodycams, CBP awarded a $13 million
contract to Axon Enterprises Inc [AXON.O] in September 2020 to equip
3,800 border patrol agents with body cameras and to connect the
cameras to a cloud-based storage system.
Axon declined to comment on the rollout. CBP did not immediately
respond to a request for comment.
CBP conducted a small pilot of body cameras in 2015, but ultimately
opted not to deploy them then.
An agency assessment at the time said the cameras would likely
reduce the use of physical force on the job, but cited a number of
reasons not to adopt the devices, including cost and agent morale.
Gil Kerlikowske, who was CBP commissioner at the time, said another
consideration was that the cameras "did not hold up particularly
well" in the field, where they could be knocked off in the brush or
mucked up with dust and dirt.
Body cameras have become more commonplace since the 2015 effort. The
U.S. Department of Justice said in June that its agents would be
required to wear cameras when serving search and arrest warrants.
Kerlikowske said many law enforcement officers support the idea,
too.
"There are now police officers who won’t go on the street without
their body camera," he said. "They want that video image."
(Reporting by Ted Hesson in Washington, editing by Ross Colvin and
Aurora Ellis)
[© 2021 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2021 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|