The
ballot measure aimed to cement app-based food delivery and
ride-hail drivers' status as independent contractors, not
employees.
Gig economy companies such as Uber, Lyft, Doordash and Instacart
were pushing to keep drivers' independent contractor status,
albeit with additional benefits.
However, in a ruling, Alameda County Superior Court Judge Frank
Roesch wrote that the measure, known as Proposition 22, was
unconstitutional.
"It limits the power of a future legislature to define app-based
drivers as workers subject to workers' compensation law", making
the entire measure unenforceable, the judge wrote.
The measure was the culmination of years of legal and
legislative wrangling over a business model that has given
millions of people the convenience of ordering food or a ride
with the push of a button.
"We will file an immediate appeal and are confident the
Appellate Court will uphold Prop 22," a group supporting the
measure, the Protect App-Based Drivers and Services Coalition,
said in a statement.
Gig economy companies scored a decisive win in California in
November, when voters of the Democratic-leaning state supported
the company-sponsored Prop 22, overwriting a state law that
would have made them employees.
The companies, whose business model relies on low-cost flexible
labor, say that surveys show the majority of their workers do
not want to be employees.
"Prop 22 has always been an illegal corporate power grab that
not only stole the wages, benefits and rights owed to gig
workers but also ended the regulating power of our elected
officials," Gig Workers Rising, which advocates for more
benefits, said after the ruling.
(Reporting by Kanishka Singh in Bengaluru; Additional reporting
by Tina Bellon in Austin, Texas; Editing by Clarence Fernandez)
[© 2021 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2021 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.

|
|