U.S. Supreme Court ends CDC's pandemic residential eviction moratorium
Send a link to a friend
[August 27, 2021]
By Lawrence Hurley and Jan Wolfe
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. Supreme
Court on Thursday ended the pandemic-related federal moratorium on
residential evictions imposed by President Joe Biden's administration in
a challenge to the policy brought by a coalition of landlords and real
estate trade groups.
The justices, who in June had left in place https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-supreme-court-maintains-cdcs-pandemic-related-residential-eviction-ban-2021-06-29
a prior ban that expired at the end of July, granted a request by the
challengers to lift the moratorium by the U.S. Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC) that was to have run until Oct. 3.
The challengers argued that the law on which the CDC relied did not
allow it to implement the current ban.
"It strains credulity to believe that this statute grants the CDC the
sweeping authority that it asserts," the court said in an unsigned
opinion.
"If a federally imposed eviction moratorium is to continue, Congress
must specifically authorize it," the court added.
The three liberal justices on the court, which has a 6-3 conservative
majority, all dissented.
The White House said it was disappointed by the decision and urged
states, local governments, landlords and Cabinet agencies to "urgently
act" to help prevent evictions.
The high court had signaled in June that it thought the moratorium was
on shaky legal ground, and that such a policy needed to be enacted by
Congress rather than being imposed unilaterally by the executive branch.
The CDC first issued a moratorium in September 2020 after a prior one
approved by Congress expired, with agency officials saying the policy
was needed to combat the spread of COVID-19 and prevent homelessness
during the pandemic.
[to top of second column]
|
The sun rises behind the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, U.S.,
June 1, 2021. REUTERS/Erin Scott/File Photo/File Photo
Under political pressure from Biden's fellow
Democrats, his administration on Aug. 3 implemented a somewhat
narrower eviction moratorium three days after the prior one expired.
Liberal Justice Stephen Breyer said in a dissenting opinion that the
outcome of the case was not as clear cut as the majority suggested
and that the court was not justified in ending the moratorium so
quickly at a time when COVID-19 cases are surging.
"The public interest strongly favors respecting the CDC’s judgment
at this moment, when over 90 percent of counties are experiencing
high transmission rates," Breyer wrote.
Citing the CDC, he said that a surge of evictions could lead to more
infections of the coronavirus.
The latest moratorium covered nearly 92% of U.S. counties - those
deemed to have "substantial" and "high" levels of coronavirus
transmission.
The policy was challenged in federal court by realtor associations
in Alabama and Georgia as well as landlords in those two states.
(Editing by Grant McCool and Jacqueline Wong)
[© 2021 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2021 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|