LaHood, Miller Introduce the U.S. Trade Leadership in the Indo-Pacific
and China Act
Send a link to a friend
[December 02, 2021]
Washington, D.C. – Ways
and Means Committee Members Darin LaHood (R-IL) and Carol Miller (R-WV)
today introduced the
U.S. Trade Leadership in the Indo-Pacific and China Act.
The bill would provide a blueprint for Congress and the Administration
to advance U.S. trade leadership in the Indo-Pacific region and with
China through encouragement of swift passage of the Trade Promotion
Authority (TPA) and directing the Administration to make efforts to lead
and modernize key trade agreements in the region. The bill also directs
the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) to
articulate a long-term trade plan with China as the initial Phase One
Agreement comes to a close.
“The United States must be a leader on trade in the
Indo-Pacific as China seeks to exert influence in the region and
throughout the globe,”
said
Congressman LaHood.
“The U.S. Trade Leadership in the Indo-Pacific and China Act utilizes
21st-century trade tools to strengthen our global competitiveness and
ensure the world follows America’s lead, not China’s. I am proud to join
my friend and Ways and Means colleague Congresswoman Carol Miller to
introduce this legislation which will compel the Biden Administration to
act to renew Trade Promotion Authority and outline a long-term economic
strategy and report to Congress on further United States engagement with
China.”
“I’m pleased to work with
Congressman LaHood in introducing this important trade legislation,”
said Congresswoman Miller.
“Our bill compels the Biden administration to accelerate U.S. economic
leadership in the critical Indo-Pacific region and to swiftly articulate
a comprehensive trade strategy with China. This is necessary to provide
clarity regarding America’s presence in the region, as well as a
clear-eyed economic plan for the U.S and China—a consequential bilateral
relationship that needs careful consideration and vigilance.”
Background:
Title I:
-
Addresses
a Sense of Congress for U.S. trade leadership in the Indo-Pacific.
-
States
that the United States should play a sustained role in establishing
an open, rules-based trading system in the Indo-Pacific by improving
and joining an existing plurilateral trade agreement, such as the
Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement on Trans-Pacific Partnership
(CPTPP), updating existing regional trade agreements, or negotiating
new, high-standard trade agreements.
[to top of second column]
|
-
Calls
to swiftly reauthorize the Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) and
directs the President to compel all key Federal agencies to meet
upon request with any Member of Congress regarding the Executive
Branch’s anticipated or on-going negotiations, as well as to
share documents relating to those negotiations, including
classified materials, on its evolving Indo-Pacific trade
strategy.
Title II:
-
States
that as Phase One comes to a close, the United States must
ensure that China honors every substantive obligation it
undertook in that deal. Further, the United States must have
clear and long-term strategy for maintaining a balanced trading
relationship between our two nations that serves U.S. economic
and national security interests.
-
On
January 15, 2020, the United States and the People’s
Republic of China signed the Economic and Trade Agreement
Between the United States of America and the People’s
Republic of China, otherwise known as the “Phase One”
agreement. This agreement was a critical first step to
balance the trading relationship between the United States
and China.
-
States
that USTR should follow TPA consultation requirements regarding
any further trade negotiations with China.
-
Requires USTR to submit a report to Congress that articulates
and identifies (1) a long-term trade and economic plan with
China that details our progress in combating China’s coercive
economic practices; (2) a comprehensive assessment of the
current Section 301 tariffs in place against China and their
efficacy in combating Chinese forced technology transfers and
intellectual property theft; (3) a complete scorecard of China’s
compliance with its Phase One commitments; (4) a listing of new
enforcement tools that will require China to make further
structural reforms; (5) new market access objectives with
respect to China; and (6) key sectors in which increased U.S.
exports would be mutually beneficial for the United States and
China.
|