Analysis-How 2021 became the year of ESG investing
Send a link to a friend
[December 23, 2021] By
Ross Kerber and Simon Jessop
BOSTON/LONDON (Reuters) - Investors
concerned about climate change and social justice had a bumper year in
2021, successfully pushing companies and regulators to make changes amid
record inflows to funds focused on environmental, social and corporate
governance (ESG) issues.
Extreme weather becoming more frequent and events highlighting social
justice issues, such as the death of George Floyd in Minneapolis police
custody, contributed to ESG rising to the top of the agenda of
investors, companies and policy makers.
A record $649 billion poured into ESG-focused funds worldwide through
Nov. 30, up from the $542 billion and $285 billion that flowed into
these funds in 2020 and 2019, respectively, the latest Refinitiv Lipper
data shows. ESG funds now account for 10% of worldwide fund assets.
Stocks of companies rated highly for their sustainability efforts also
notched gains. The MSCI World ESG Leaders' index has risen 22% so far
this year, compared with the MSCI World Index's gain of 15%.
Investors flexed their muscle to challenge companies' ESG credentials,
culminating in a landmark board challenge against oil major Exxon Mobil
Corp. Support for social and environmental proposals at the shareholder
meetings of U.S. companies rose to 32% in 2021 from 27% in 2020 and from
21% in 2017, according to the Sustainable Investments Institute.
"It was a watershed year," said Tim Smith, a director at investment
management firm Boston Trust Walden.
He contrasted the votes this year with one of the earliest corporate
social policy measures, in 1971, when only 1% of General Motors'
shareholders backed an investor resolution for the auto maker to
withdraw from South Africa over the country's racist social policies at
the time.
Regulators have responded to the new pressure by making ESG disclosures
a priority. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has been
asking money managers about the ESG classifications they use for their
funds and is expected to firm up guidance on corporate disclosures such
as carbon emissions.
The European Commission has finalized most of its "sustainable finance
taxonomy" rulebook on which corporate activities can be labeled
climate-friendly. Rules will apply to some sectors in the European Union
starting next month.
Of the $6.1 trillion in ESG funds, 59% of the money is held in Europe,
Middle East and Africa, according to Lipper, reflecting the region's
earlier embrace of the investing trend.
Inflows in European ESG funds dropped in 2021, but this was more than
offset by rising flows into U.S. and Asian ESG funds.
[to top of second column] |
Extinction Rebellion climate activists protest outside the Bank of
England in London, Britain, September 2, 2021. REUTERS/Henry
Nicholls/File Photo
Major wins for ESG investors pushing for changes at companies this year included
the replacement of three directors at Exxon Mobil, the rejection of a $230
million pay package for General Electric Co's CEO Lawrence Culp, and a
successful call for Union Pacific to make public its workforce diversity
statistics.
Catherine Winner, global head of stewardship at Goldman Sachs Group Inc's asset
management division, which backed the critical shareholder efforts at those
three companies, said investors are no longer satisfied with companies
delivering shareholder returns without doing more for the environment and
society.
"It's not just about shareholders; it's about all stakeholders" she said.
ESG SETBACKS
To be sure, ESG investors also suffered blows in 2021. Shareholder resolutions
that drew significant support but did not gain majorities included a call to
reform employment arbitration procedures at Tesla Inc and a call for Amazon.com
to review how it addresses racial justice and equity.
Many top corporate investors warmed up to ESG resolutions, even if they did not
back them most of them time. Out of 49 climate-related resolutions this year,
BlackRock Inc supported 41%, up from 10% of a similar set of resolutions in
2020, according to advocacy group Ceres. Vanguard funds increased their support
to 37% from 14%.
Both major index fund companies declined to comment on the Ceres report. But
they have previously said companies must have appropriate risk oversight of
environmental and social issues, and that they try to be transparent about their
views.
In the United States, companies can sometimes avoid putting shareholder
resolutions to a vote by asking the SEC for permission. Thomas Skulski, managing
director at proxy solicitor Morrow Sodali, said the SEC strengthened the hand of
ESG investors in November by narrowing the circumstances under which companies
can skip votes.
As a result, companies next year could face more challenges on operational
issues, such as how they use consumer packaging or plastics, Skulski said.
(Reporting by Ross Kerber in Boston and Simon Jessop in New York; Editing by
Greg Roumeliotis and Lisa Shumaker)
[© 2021 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2021 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |