Appeals court puts part of ruling against New York Times coverage of
Project Veritas on hold
Send a link to a friend
[December 29, 2021]
By Jonathan Stempel
NEW YORK (Reuters) - A New York state
appeals court on Tuesday put on hold part of a trial judge's decision
blocking the New York Times from reporting on documents prepared by a
lawyer for the conservative activist group Project Veritas.
Justice William Ford of the Appellate Division in Brooklyn said the
Times does not have to turn over or destroy its copies of documents
prepared by Project Veritas' in-house lawyer Benjamin Barr while it
appeals the coverage ban.
On Friday, in a ruling that alarmed First Amendment advocates, Justice
Charles Wood of the state Supreme Court in Westchester County said
Barr's memos were not a matter of public concern, and rejected the
Times' claim that barring coverage would unconstitutionally restrain its
journalism.
The newspaper's editorial board called Wood's decision dangerous and his
rationale "breathtaking," saying no court should tell news media how to
conduct their reporting and risk subjecting them to frivolous libel
lawsuits as a means of controlling news coverage.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0a21/e0a21387027095fc0990c323981f81b32d029441" alt=""
Ford directed Project Veritas to address by Jan. 14, 2022, why Wood's
decision should not be thrown out, or at least stayed through a possibly
expedited Times appeal.
Elizabeth Locke, a lawyer for Project Veritas, in an email said the
group "joined The Times in its very limited request to maintain the
status quo to allow appellate review because the proper administration
of justice is paramount to American democracy, the First Amendment, and
the press' freedom under it."
[to top of second column]
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5948/e5948ddb83c7f528cc3d14ea3d34953d625648eb" alt=""
The New York Times building is seen in Manhattan, New York, U.S.,
August 3, 2020. REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton/File Photo
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4974f/4974f165b2560b4425bcb8e0ab1ed8df08353ec9" alt="" Times spokesman Jordan Cohen in an
email said the newspaper was pleased that parts of Wood's
"unconstitutional order" were stayed, and looked forward to having
the Appellate Division vacate the order.
Led by James O'Keefe, Project Veritas has used what critics view as
deceptive tactics to expose what it describes as liberal media bias.
The group is the subject of a U.S. Department of Justice probe into
its possible role in the theft of a diary from President Joe Biden's
daughter Ashley, which a right-wing website excerpted.
Project Veritas had been suing the Times for defamation over a
September 2020 article describing a video it released concerning
alleged voter fraud in Minnesota.
It subsequently objected to a Nov. 11 Times article that drew from
Barr's memos, calling the publication an attempt to embarrass a
litigation adversary.
The Times had not faced any prior restraint since 1971, when the
Nixon administration unsuccessfully sought to block the publication
of the Pentagon Papers detailing U.S. military involvement in
Vietnam.
(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Matthew
Lewis)
[© 2021 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2021 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |