Lawsuits over indoor dining ban proceed as all regions reopen
Send a link to a friend
[February 05, 2021]
By SARAH MANSUR
Capitol News Illinois
smansur@capitolnewsillinois.com
SPRINGFIELD — Although the governor’s
latest indoor dining ban has been lifted in all areas of the state, some
lawsuits brought by restaurants challenging the ban remain active.
Among those are the cases filed by Tom DeVore, a southern Illinois
lawyer who represents Sen. Darren Bailey, R-Xenia, and advises hundreds
of other business clients who are staying open during the pandemic.
DeVore has argued, on behalf of restaurants, that Pritzker lacks the
authority under the Illinois Emergency Management Agency Act – the
statute through which the governor’s lawyers have claimed his authority
is derived – to close businesses via emergency order. DeVore instead
argues this power belongs to the Illinois Department of Public Health
under the Illinois Department of Public Health Act.
This week, DeVore filed a motion asking a Sangamon County judge to
voluntarily dismiss the lawsuits he initiated on behalf of two downstate
restaurants against Pritzker and eight local health department officials
in COVID-19 mitigation Region 4.
DeVore argues the lawsuits are no longer necessary, citing statements
from health department officials from four of the eight health
departments that they never enforced the executive orders because they
lacked the authority to do so.
According to DeVore, this claim by the health departments should make
clear to restaurants across the state that health departments did not
possess the authority to shutter businesses based on the governor’s
executive order.
Health department officials in Clinton, Bond, Washington and Randolph
counties, which are within Region 4, claimed in a court filing that the
lawsuit against them should be dismissed because the health departments
didn’t take any action to enforce the ban and therefore did not cause an
injury to the restaurants.
They also argue that the health departments did not have authority in
the first place to enforce the bans because the executive orders do not
identify the IDPH Act as the statute authorizing enforcement. The
governor’s executive order on Nov. 28 lists the state Emergency
Management Agency Act as the only statute authorizing enforcement.
Notably, the health departments’ court filing does not address the
argument that the Emergency Management Agency Act authorizes local
health departments to enforce the governor’s executive orders.
It also ignores the municipal and county boards that passed ordinances
authorizing local officials to enforce the executive orders. Those
ordinances have resulted in fines and food or liquor license suspensions
for some restaurants, including some represented by DeVore, that were
flouting the indoor dining ban in certain counties, including Sangamon
County.
Still, DeVore wrote in his motion in Sangamon County Court that the
professed lack of enforcement by county health officials in Region 4
resolves the need for court intervention.
Benjamin Jacobi, one of the lawyers representing the county health
departments, did not respond to a request for comment.
Lawyers with the Illinois Attorney General’s Office, which represents
the governor in court, have not yet filed a response to the health
departments’ motion.
[to top of second column]
|
Sangamon County Courthouse in Springfield. (Capitol
News Illinois file photo).
FoxFire restaurant
A second active case over the indoor dining ban was brought by
owners of FoxFire, a restaurant in Kane County, who are also
appealing their case to the Illinois Supreme Court.
FoxFire’s initial lawsuit was in response to Pritzker’s executive
order in October that imposed the ban on indoor dining and bar
service following a spike in COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations
throughout the state.
While a Kane County judge initially granted the restaurant’s request
for a temporary restraining order allowing FoxFire to ignore the new
indoor dining restrictions, an appellate court promptly reversed the
judge’s decision.
The appellate court rejected the arguments from FoxFire’s legal
team. It ruled that Pritzker’s executive order did not amount to a
“closure” for businesses, therefore Illinois Department of Public
Health Act regulations governing business closures did not apply in
this case.
Since then, FoxFire’s attorneys asked the Illinois Supreme Court to
hear the case and overrule the appellate court’s decision. The
Illinois Supreme Court has not taken any action thus far.
Meanwhile, as FoxFire has remained open throughout the fall and
winter in defiance of the governor’s orders, its case in Sangamon
County continues to proceed.
Kevin Nelson, one of FoxFire’s attorneys, has asked Pritzker’s
administration to provide evidence, also referred to as discovery,
related to the administration’s decision to shut down indoor dining
in Kane County.
For example, FoxFire’s request asks for any documentation showing
that bars and restaurants in Kane County are the primary source of
COVID-19 increases within the county.
The request also asks for documentation showing the connection
between the fall season rise in COVID cases and restaurants
throughout the state, among other demands.
Pritzker’s lawyers have objected to the requests and have not
provided any of the documents or information requested.
Earlier this week, Nelson filed a motion asking the Sangamon County
judge to overrule Pritzker’s objections and force his agencies to
provide the information.
Sangamon County Judge Raylene Grischow is expected to rule on that
motion in early March, according to court documents.
Nelson did not respond to requests for comment by deadline.
A spokesperson for the Illinois Attorney General’s Office said the
governor’s lawyers filed a motion “opposing discovery because, as
the judge considers our motion to dismiss the remaining claim, there
is no need for discovery – particularly when the plaintiffs are
seeking information that is publicly available on the Illinois
Department of Public Health’s website.”
Capitol News Illinois is a nonprofit, nonpartisan
news service covering state government and distributed to more than
400 newspapers statewide. It is funded primarily by the Illinois
Press Foundation and the Robert R. McCormick Foundation. |