Source: Reuters
Businesses in midtown Manhattan boarded up during continued
protests in New York
Workers of the South Lake Union Whole Foods protest against
store management not allowing workers to wear Black Lives Matter
apparel in Seattle
Twenty-seven plaintiffs had accused Whole Foods in a proposed
nationwide class action filed in Boston of selectively enforcing
its dress code banning "visible slogans, messages, logos or
advertising" unrelated to the company.
The plaintiffs said Whole Foods would send workers home without
pay or impose disciplinary actions for wearing the masks and
related apparel, even as it let employees wear masks bearing
political messages and sports team logos.
U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs, however, said Whole Foods
and its parent, Amazon.com Inc, did not engage in racial
discrimination or violate Title VII of the federal Civil Rights
Act of 1964.
"At worst, they were selectively enforcing a dress code to
suppress certain speech in the workplace," she wrote. "However
unappealing that might be, it is not conduct made unlawful by
Title VII."
Burroughs said one plaintiff can pursue a retaliation claim.
The plaintiffs' lawyer Shannon Liss-Riordan expects her clients
to appeal, saying in an email the decision "goes against the
tide of case law recognizing the critical importance of
eradicating race discrimination from worksites across our
country."
Whole Foods has said its dress code was "facially neutral" and
that it has "zero tolerance" for retaliation. It has also along
with Amazon expressed support for Black Lives Matter.
"We remain dedicated to ensuring our team members feel safe and
free from discrimination and retaliation," a spokesman said
following Burroughs' decision.
The judge said employees who are not happy with the policy could
try to persuade Whole Foods to change it, express themselves
outside the workplace and perhaps encourage consumers to shop
elsewhere, or find somewhere else to work.
A video showing the death last May 25 of George Floyd at the
hands of Minneapolis police sparked nationwide protests about
racial injustice, including the treatment of Blacks in police
custody.
The case is Frith et al v Whole Foods Market Inc, U.S. District
Court, District of Massachusetts, No. 20-11358.
(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Leslie
Adler and Sonya Hepinstall)
[© 2021 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2021 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d861f/d861f25da1d47e17cd9c307f84bd251d796086df" alt=""
|
|