Federal court denies state motion in transgender prisoner case
Send a link to a friend
[February 06, 2021]
By RAYMON TRONCOSO
Capitol News Illinois
smansur@capitolnewsillinois.com
SPRINGFIELD — A federal district court in
Southern Illinois denied a request Thursday from the Illinois Department
of Corrections to dismiss a class-action lawsuit against the department
for its treatment of transgender prisoners.
That case, Monroe v. Jeffreys, was originally filed in 2018 as Monroe v.
Rauner by the American Civil Liberties Union on behalf of five
transgender women in IDOC custody. According to the ACLU of Illinois,
the prisoners have experienced “denials of basic medical treatment” and
“inordinate delays” in care.
The case became a class-action lawsuit last year after the court
certified transgender individuals in IDOC custody as collective
plaintiffs.
“There is no medical reason for such excruciatingly painful and risky
denials, delays, and other missteps in providing treatment to prisoners
with gender dysphoria,” the ACLU’s webpage for the case reads.
The ACLU won a preliminary injunction in the case in 2019 when U.S.
District Judge Nancy Rosenstengel ordered IDOC to reform its policies
for dealing with transgender inmates. Prior to the ruling, IDOC was
found to have used a “Transgender Care and Review Committee” to make
medical decisions regarding trans prisoners, despite the committee
having no members qualified for professionally treating gender dysphoria.
As a result, Rosenstengel’s order required IDOC to bring in qualified
medical experts to develop care plans for transgender detainees based on
the World Professional Association for Transgender Health’s standards of
care, give inmates medical evaluations for gender dysphoria and provide
monitored hormone therapy to transgender prisoners seeking to transition
in custody.
[to top of second column]
|
IDOC’s attempt to have the case dismissed through summary judgment
was based “in part on the efforts that have been made to comply with
the preliminary injunction,” an argument the court rejected
Thursday. Its opinion stated the defendants “have not yet
implemented the policy changes they describe, and many practices
which gave rise to this suit are still ongoing.”
Even though IDOC has not fully implemented every reform ordered in
that 2019 injunction, the court issued a Jan. 6 opinion that “(IDOC
officials) are indeed still working diligently to implement the
Court's preliminary injunction order,” and acknowledged delays were
unavoidable due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
While the court has denied IDOC’s request for a dismissal, it also
denied the plaintiff’s request in January for an independent monitor
to be appointed to oversee IDOC’s compliance with the mandated
reforms.
“After months of dragging their feet and ignoring the clear needs of
our clients in their custody, the State instead sought to get out of
the lawsuit... That is wholly inadequate for our clients, who
continue to endure significant harm from existing Department
policies,” John Knight, LGBTQ director at the ACLU of Illinois, said
in a Friday release. “We are pleased the Court soundly rejected the
State’s effort to escape its constitutional duty to promptly reform
its health care system and hope to have a chance soon to prove our
case at trial.”
A spokesperson for IDOC said the department could not comment on
pending litigation.
Capitol News Illinois is a nonprofit, nonpartisan
news service covering state government and distributed to more than
400 newspapers statewide. It is funded primarily by the Illinois
Press Foundation and the Robert R. McCormick Foundation. |