Illinois House adopts new rules on partisan lines
Send a link to a friend
[February 11, 2021]
By Peter Hancock
Capitol News Illinois
phancock@capitolnewsillinois.com
SPRINGFIELD – The Illinois House adopted
new rules on Wednesday that Democrats say are intended to make the
legislative process more transparent, but Republicans argue they don’t
go far enough in reforming how the General Assembly operates.
The new rules represent one of the first attempts by newly-elected House
Speaker Emanuel “Chris” Welch to break from the practices and traditions
of his predecessor, former Speaker Michael Madigan. Madigan’s opponents
claimed he exercised vast authority to decide which bills would be
assigned to committees, which ones would come to the floor for a vote,
and which ones would not.
“These new house rules really do represent a historical turning point in
rules development and adoption in the House of Representatives,” House
Majority Leader Greg Harris, D-Chicago, said while explaining the new
rules.
Harris said the rules are also “just a first step in reforming ways of
the past and injecting more transparency and accountability, while
ensuring our chamber operates effectively and fairly.”
One of the most significant changes from the Madigan era is a new rule
that limits any individual to serving no more than five biennial
sessions, or 10 years, in either the office of speaker or minority
leader. Madigan served in that role for all but two years from 1983
until this January.
Another major change allows legislative committees to meet and take
votes remotely “in the case of pestilence or public danger.” The
inability to meet virtually has been a handicap for the House since the
start of the COVID-19 pandemic, which virtually shut down the 2020
regular session as well as the fall veto session.
House leaders have said they plan to limit most legislative activity to
remote committee meetings at least through the end of February, and they
don’t plan on the full House coming back into session to vote on bills
until sometime in March or April.
Other changes are more technical in nature, but still important to the
legislative process, including rules that apply to the Rules Committee
itself. That’s a committee, usually made up of top legislative leaders,
where all bills and resolutions go first and then get referred to other
committees.
It has also been a committee where, in the opinion of some, good
legislation would go to die because the committee had the option of
sitting on bills and not referring them to any other committee, thus
ensuring they would never receive a hearing or come up for a vote.
Under the new rules, in odd-numbered years, the Rules Committee will be
required to refer all House bills it receives to a substantive committee
before the deadline for committees to act on bills, as long as the bill
was filed in a timely fashion. Exceptions exist if the principal sponsor
asks for it to be held for some reason.
[to top of second column]
|
Rep. Tom Demmer, R-Dixon, and Majority Leader Greg
Harris, D-Chicago, converse on the floor of the Illinois House
Wednesday before discussing proposed House rules for the 102nd
General Assembly. (Credit: Justin Fowler of the State
Journal-Register
“Once again, the members of the 102nd General Assembly are making it
clear that this does mark the end of business as usual,” Rep.
Lindsey LaPointe, D-Chicago, said during debate on the rules. “These
new rules have been developed through a fair and transparent process
that has brought in good ideas from both sides of the aisle.”
Republicans, however, argued that the change would make little
difference because individual committee chairs could still stifle
legislation, either by never calling a hearing on a bill or by
referring it to a subcommittee, which would be under no obligation
to ever meet.
They also argued that the rule applies only to bills and not to
proposed constitutional amendments such as the so-called “Fair Maps”
amendment, which has support from members of both parties in its
effort to overhaul the way Illinois redraws legislative and
congressional district lines every 10 years.
Republicans had also pushed for other changes such as requiring
public notices for which bills would be considered in committees or
on the House floor each day, something that in many cases isn’t
decided until the last minute.
“We’ve had too many instances, the latest being in lame duck
session, where significant bills were brought forward for debate at
the 11th hour,” Rep. Mark Batinick, R-Plainfield, said during
debate. “As lawmakers we need adequate time to read bills in final
form and time to determine our position on each issue like we did
with these rules, which was really a nice process.”
Harris responded to those criticisms by saying that members of both
parties have used the rules in recent years to get around the normal
posting requirements. But he also said Democrats would be willing to
consider additional changes if the two sides can come to an
agreement.
“I stand with the speaker in saying we look forward to working with
you in the next several months on addressing some of these items,
and if we all agree that there are some problems to fix and we come
to a consensus, then let’s fix them,” Harris said.
Capitol News Illinois is a nonprofit, nonpartisan
news service covering state government and distributed to more than
400 newspapers statewide. It is funded primarily by the Illinois
Press Foundation and the Robert R. McCormick Foundation.
|